Weekly Report for Week Ending April 5, 2007


LSC

Administration

Hanford Observatory

Livingston Observatory

Optical & Mechanical

Controls and Data Systems

40 Meter Facility

TNI

LASTI

CIT Science Group

Laboratory Computing

Adv. LIGO Development

Past Weekly Reports


The LIGO Executive Committee Agenda for Monday, Monday, April 9, 2007 will be:

(Meeting time: 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time)

1. Announcements

2. Programmatic (Marx)

  • Thermal Noise Interferometer (Eric Black)

3. Comments on Weekly Report

4. LSC Issues (Reitze)

5. LIGO Lab Operations

  • Administration (Lindquist)
  • Sites (Raab, Zucker, Shoemaker)
  • Commissioning (Fritschel)
  • Optical and Mechanical (Coyne)
  • Control and Data Systems (Bork)
  • 40m (Weinstein)
  • TNI (Libbrecht)
  • LASTI (Ottaway)
  • Lab computing ( Anderson )
  • Data Analysis Group (Weinstein)
  • Instrument Science (Gustafson)
  • Science Group (Weinstein)

6. Enhancements (Zucker)

7. Advanced LIGO (Shoemaker)

8. Change Control Board/Technical Review Board Session as needed

  • There are no open change requests

Site and other Business Issues:

  • Results of State Fire Marshal inspection of SEC.  Status of permanent Certificate of Occupancy.
  • Operating procedure for SEC bookstore/gift shop
  • Site staffing status
  • Financial performance of sites

Special Items:


Special Announcements:


Weekly Report Highlights


LSC Issues (Reitze)

Two observational papers,

were submitted today to Physical Review D in the past week.   In addition, the S4 stochastic paper will appear in the April 20, 2007 issue of Astrophysical Journal (volume 659, page 918).

LIGO Laboratory Administration (Lindquist)

DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (Turner, Mak)

>From: Cleveland Mak <mak_c@ligo.caltech.edu>

Update to Current Document Management System (Lindquist)

No report.

FINANCIAL SYSTEMS (Funaro, Brambila, Kaufman)

>From: "Funaro, Catherine" <Catherine.Funaro@caltech.edu>

>From: "Brambila, Ruth" <Ruth.Brambila@caltech.edu>

>From: Florence Kaufman <fkaufman>

SUBCONTRACTS MANAGEMENT (Jasnow, Salone)

>From: Gina Salone <gsalone@ligo.caltech.edu>

>From: Ed Jasnow <jasnow@ligo.caltech.edu>

PROPOSALS and REPORTS (Lindquist)

I am maintaining a web site containing information and useful pointers for the preparation of the proposal for continuing operations (FY 2007 - FY 2013).  User IDs and Passwords have been provided to those who asked.

The end of March report for the NSF is due next week.  I have distributed an outline and requests for submittals.

CHANGE CONTROL/CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT (Lindquist)

HUMAN RESOURCES (Akutagawa)

>From: Cindy Akutagawa <cindy@ligo.caltech.edu>


Quality/Safety (Tyler)

>From: Bill Tyler tyler@ligo.caltech.edu

At the LIGO safety committee meeting this week, we agreed to adopt the proposed roles and function statements prepared by Caz Scislowicz (Caltech Safety Office).  These will be incorporated into the revised/updated LIGO safety plan.

The committee was not able to reach agreement on how to establish an "incident reporting threshold".  One of the main issues was if it was necessary to report all incidents or if some "minor-types" could be ignored and not reported?  At this meeting, the committee's conclusions were: that some reporting guidelines would be useful, rely on the "site-safety-officer" as the main "point-of-contact" to screen/advise/decide if a report was required, and the committee would assess the incident reporting to determine if it was satisfactory or needed to be revised.

The Livingston safety review will be conducted on the 15th and 16th of May 2007.


LIGO Hanford Observatory (LHO) and Interferometer Operations (Raab)

Summary of S5 Activities at LIGO Hanford Observatory  (compiled by M. Landry)

This was a quiet week with good duty cycles : H1 - 88%, H2 - 87%.  The range on H1 remained ~15-16Mpc during quiet running periods, while H2 continues to languish below 7Mpc most of the time, often at~6.5Mpc.  Quakes (Azores, Afghanistan, Solomon Islands) were a major source of unlocking events.

Some S5 highlights from the LHO elog are bulleted below:


LIGO Livingston Observatory (LLO) and Interferometer Operations (Giaime)

S5 Run (Brian O'Reilly):

LLO Outreach (John Thacker):

LIGO computing and network security (Roddy)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reported under General Computing, see below.

General computing and LDAS admin (Giardina)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reported under General Computing, see below

Reported under LDAS System Administration, see below

Data analysis & computing (Yakushin)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Storage/Condor/LDAS admin:
Reported under LDAS System Administration, see below

Data analysis:

Reported under Data Analysis activities, see below


Mechanical and Optical Systems (Coyne)

See Advanced LIGO


Controls and Data Systems (Bork)

From: Rolf Bork rolf@ligo.caltech.edu

40m Lab

AdL CDS Infrastructure

AdL SUS Noise Prototype

OMC Suspension

Tip-Tilt equipment for ANU

The equipment needed for ANU includes:

AdL PSL

AdL ISI

See Advanced LIGO


40-Meter Interferometer (Weinstein)

IFO Commissioning, DC readout, Electronics, Controls, Computers

DC Detection

Vacuum Squeezing

Lab Infrastructure, Bake Lab


Thermal Noise Interferometer (Black)

Some new information has come from LMA, via Innocenzo, about the optimized coatings. Regular readers of this column may recall that the aperiodic mirrors we had hoped to measure coating thermal noise in have been delayed due to difficulties in fabrication. At first, it looked like there were scratches on the cap layer, and the first "usual suspect" was contamination from residual polishing compound.  (These mirrors were used in a previous experiment, and their first coatings had been stripped off so that we could reuse the substrates.) LMA tried to find out if this was the case and, if so,  what they could do about it. Eventually, they concluded that it was not, after all, a contamination issue. Moreover, the problem appeared to be bubbles, rather than scratches. First candidate ruled out.

Next, it was thought that the bubbles only appeared in our mirrors and not in conventional, quarter-wave coatings. This gave rise to the fear that it might be difficult to make very thin (less than quarter- wave) layers, which would be bad for aperiodic coatings. Now the bubbles are showing up in quarter-wave layers, and they are suspecting the issue is with the coating machine, not the mirrors or the design.

LASTI (Ottaway)

CIT Science Group (Weinstein)

________________________

Kent Blackburn:

OPEN SCIENCE GRID VALIDATION TESTBED

No VTB activity this week.

OPEN SCIENCE GRID INTEGRATION TESTBED

OPEN SCIENCE GRID APPLICATION

OPEN SCIENCE GRID MANAGEMENT

_____________________________

Eirini Messaritaki:

_____________________________

Xavier Siemens:


Laboratory Computing (Anderson)

LDAS Software (Maros)

LDAS System Administration (Anderson)

Caltech

(Dan Kozak)

(Phil Ehrens)

(Erik Espinoza)

MIT

(Fred Donovan)

Livingston

(Dwayne Giardina)

Hanford

(Ben Johnson)

General Computing (Wallace)

MIT

(Fred)

Livingston

(Dwayne)

(Shannon)

Hanford

(Christine)

CIT

(Bruce Sears)

(Veronica)

(Christian)

(Mike)

(Larry)


Advanced LIGO and Supporting R&D (Shoemaker)

Advanced LIGO Systems

Modeling and Simulation

From: Hiroaki Yamamoto hiro@ligo.caltech.edu

e2e weekly meeting

Osamu explained the ITM and ETM mirror angular fluctuation and noises cause by those angular fluctuation. He explained details, emphasizing the importance of the whitening and dewhitening and windowing, when one is analyzing spectrum with string frequency dependence.

Sany Yoshida explained his strategy how to setup the coordinate systems, LAB - SEI - SUS and COC. He also discussed about the improvements of the length and frequency control of the advLIGO MC system he is working on.

AdvLIGO LSC/ASC design using FP arm model with quad suspension (Osamu)

As Rana's request, we are looking at the noise of angle motion of ITM and ETM during lock with low power. However we found that Matlab fft has a precision limit if the frequency slope is too steep. I applied a whitening filter on time series data and dewhitening filter on frequency domain data to recover high frequency tiny data. As a result of this process, the slopes reasonably matched predicted lines. Then we saw another limit by e2e and matlab numerical accuracy by using double precision,  but the noise level is already 1e-22 and it is low enough for the AdLIGO noise floor.

Scattering loss (Hiro)

There were some focused discussions on scattering losses, including John Stover of The Scatter Works and Chris Walsh of ARC Centre of Excellence for Ultra-high bandwidth Devices for Optical Systems (CUDOS). 

A very biased private summary is in www.ligo.caltech.edu/~hiro/advLIGO/scatteringHirosView.pdf. In the same directory, one can find a lecture about scattering given by John Stover on March 29th, BRDF_Basics_III.pdf (and .PPT).

One consensus coming out is that the CSIRO measurement of LIGO I mirrors by CSIRO was an underestimation of true roughness. 

They reported rms = 0.17nm for wavelength > 3.8cm^-1. This is based on their TOPO measurements. They subtracted tilt and curvature and calculated the RMS. This was needed because :

"Tilt is purely a measurement artefact associated with set up of the substrate and should always be removed. Curvature is part measurement artefact associated with the set up of the substrate and may be part the contribution of a surface feature whose wavelength is considerably larger than the measurement aperture. In either case, removal of curvature is also justified. To repeat: these terms must be removed because they are not real." (excerpt from Chris Walsh e-mail on April 4)

Still this process to discard "not real" artifact introduces some bias to make the "measured" rms to be smaller. This was demonstrated by generating data with similar spectrum as the micro roughness. The rms after subtracting tilt and curvature component was a half of the value of rms calculated without the subtraction.  This makes the estimated loss to be 21ppm, instead of 5ppm.

This rms or loss was calculated in another way. CSIRO wrote a paper analyzing the LIGO I mirror (Appl.Opt. 38 4790-4801 (1999)). They show PSDs of three measurements covering difference frequency regions. TOPO measurements with different magnifications show the artifact mentioned above. These three data sets can be fit by a smooth line in the region about 1cm-1. Using this smooth line, the rms above 3.8cm-1 was calculated to get about twice as large rms than they reported.

So, the RMS of micro roughness is WORSE than we expected. The larger angle BRDF (4.4 10^-8 / theta^-2.45)  is slightly better than original estimation (10^-6 / theta^2), but not as good as is estimated in T060013 (5e-13/ theta^3.6).

The total loss per LIGO I mirror has been estimated to be ~70ppm based on several measurements, including visibility, large angle measurement by Bill K, power recycling gain, etc. Out of this 70ppm, 20-30ppm could be explained by the loss due to the surface figure and others and 30-50ppm was unknown loss. Now the micro roughness measurement could explain 15-25ppm out of these losses "unaccounted for" hitherto.

Some 10-20ppm loss can be attributed to the spotty large angle scattering losses. 

The FFT will be refined so that the loss in the region between 1mm ~ 5mm will be reexamined to quantify the loss in this region more carefully.

The requirement of the micro roughness for the advanced LIGO mirror will need to be reevaluated so that the roughness is consistent with our requirement based on the loss budget.

Modeler - e2e simulation engine (Hiro, Bruce, Melody)

Bruce and Melody worked to implement and refine the interface to support the User Defined Primitive modules, including parsing, editing and loading .udp files in Alfi and parsing in modeler.

Bruce kept working on the integration of the udp support in modeler.

Mechanical Simulation for advanced LIGO (Sany and SLU team)

Found an error in the coordinate transformation from the HAM table to the triple suspension in our e2e modeling of AdvLIGO Input Mode Cleaner (the triple suspension model developed by Mark Barton uses a different coordinate system from the single suspension e2e model used for Initial LIGO). Consequently, in the previous computation with the correct orientations of MC1 and MC3 (about 45 deg off the X-arm direction), the suspension point motions sent to these optics were lower than what they ought to be. Fixed the problem and repeated the computation to find that the dc gains for the frequency and length sensing controls needed to be increased to lock the cavity. Will continue the computation to optimize these gain settings.

CDS

Prestabilized Laser

From: Peter King <pking@ligo.caltech.edu>

Assembly of the lab prototype 35-W laser is near completion.  A problem with the 2-W NPRO noise eater was fixed when the circuit board was replaced by InnoLight.  Alignment of the optical train was completed and mode matched to the amplifier.  The output power of the laboratory prototype was 36.7 W with a nice beam - as it appeared on a camera; it hasn't been characterised by the diagnostic breadboard as yet.  The transfer function of the high-bandwidth current modulation input was measured.  The shape of the magnitude response changed with increasing the source amplitude and exhibited a resonance around 20 kHz.  Whilst it is not planned to use this actuator for the intensity stabilisation, it was interesting to note.

I also saw the diode box / power supply assembly for the 35-W laser.  One problem might be that when the diodes are energized, the noise from the power supply fans increases a great deal. Replacement fans for the OEM power supplies have been ordered. A minor problem with the software interface was fixed.

I suggested to Christian that the interface should be more obvious to indicate when the laser is on.  The current button animation combined with wearing laser safety eyewear tended to make it hard to tell. 

Seismic Isolation

From: Ken Mason kmason@ligo.mit.edu

BSC Seismic Isolation Assembly and Test

The large seismic isolation parts have had the dirty heli-coil inserts removed and have been sent to Galli & Morelli for cleaning. Bob Taylor has cleaned and baked the first crate of parts. He expects to ship them to MIT early next week. Bob has also cleaned the replacement conflat feedthrus. One of the BNC connectors has leaked and has been returned to Accu-Glass.

The new actuator mounts which moves the stage 0 - 1 horizontal actuator to the LZMP of the flexure has been completed.

HAM Single Stage Design

The FDR was held at HPD on Monday. Everyone in attendance felt they did an exceptional job of completing the design and exceeding the requirements within the short schedule given to them. Notes and action items has been posted on the LIGO HPD ilog dated 4/3.

We are working with HPD to obtain quotes for the fabrication of two units for enhanced LIGO. This has resulted in a big decrease in the per unit cost.

From: Dennis Coyne coyne@ligo.caltech.edu

The HAM-SAS team have written a report, T070079-00, on the results to date of the HAM-SAS prototype testing. It has been submitted to the DCC, but can be found in the interim here:

http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~coyne/AL/SEI/HAM_SAS/evaluation/T070079-00.pdf

In addition, there is a companion report, T070080-00, with details on the problems encountered and the solutions obtained during installation and commissioning, which may be of interest to the committee:

http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~coyne/AL/SEI/HAM_SAS/evaluation/T070080-00.pdf

From: Ben Abbott abbott_b@ligo.caltech.edu

All new activity since last weekly is written in red.

40m:

DCPD

HAM-SAS:
Custom Electronics chassis: (# needed + #spares)

Commercial Electronics:

Miscellaneous:

ISI:

Suspensions

From: Norna Robertson <nroberts@ligo.caltech.edu>

From: Janeen Romie <janeen@ligo-la.caltech.edu>

Enhanced/Advanced LIGO

From: k mailand kmailand@ligo.caltech.edu

Core Optics

From: Bill Kells kells@ligo.caltech.edu

The intense discussion of likely HR mirror loss for AdLIGO as gleaned from LIGO I performance and tests continues! We have formulated several next step necessary tests and comparisions:

Also: reviewed (second edition) the latest paper on PI by Vyatchanin et. al.

From: GariLynn Billingsley <Billingsley_G@ligo.caltech.edu>

Detailed investigation into inconsistent LIGO1 results lead us to believe that we have underestimated the scatter loss from initial LIGO optic microroughness.  At present this is still qualitative, initial estimates now put the theoretical microroughness loss at ~20ppm.  Our earlier understanding was that the microroughness loss was ~5ppm on test mass optics.  Current scatter data indicate there is still a contribution from point defects, we are working on quantifying this with an aim to developing a process to produce optics that are free of point defects.

We have decided to not pursue a no-wedge configuration for the ITM for Advanced LIGO.  It seems possible to accomplish, yet we would need a research project to be sure we can get good enough metrology on the uncoated optics to produce the surfaces required for Advanced LIGO.

Auxiliary Optics

From: Michael Smith smith@ligo.caltech.edu

SLC

I revised the SLC conceptual design requirements doc into two separate documents: Design Requirements and Conceptual Design. A meeting was held at MIT with P. Fritschel and D. Ottaway to discuss the revised documents. The following recommendations were made:

AOS Procurement Plan: Worked with C. Wilkinson and completed the AOS Procurement Plan

ELI

From: Chris Echols cechols@ligo.caltech.edu

AOS

An update to the VE System Layout (D060165) was performed, with the following changes: piers and seismic system added to the end chamber, walls of the end station modelled, bellows added between the BSC's, spool piece shortened.  The end chamber was moved so that the pier centers are inside the crane access area.

SUS

Output Mode Cleaner Suspension: the coil holder (tablecloth) has been completed by the Aero Shop at Caltech.  Nitronic-60 inserts were ordered by J. Romie and have been delivered; these will be installed in the tablecloth brackets.  OMC parts in fabrication at the Caltech CES shop are on schedule for delivery on 09 April.  Parts in fabrication at the Physics Shop have not yet been delivered.  Drawings of the cable clamps for the OMC are being completed and will be submitted for fabrication shortly.


For additional information about this report, contact Albert Lazzarini or Phil Lindquist