Weekly Report for Week Ending January 18, 2007


LSC

Administration

Hanford Observatory

Livingston Observatory

Optical & Mechanical

Controls and Data Systems

40 Meter Facility

TNI

LASTI

CIT Science Group

Laboratory Computing

Adv. LIGO Development

Past Weekly Reports


There will be no LIGO Executive Committee scheduled Monday, January 22, 2006 due to the Staffing Committee Meeting scheduled for that time.


Weekly Report Highlights: LSC overwhemlingly approves MOU between LIGO and Virgo


LSC Issues (Saulson)

After a special telephone meeting of the LSC Council on Friday 12 January, the Council voted (by email) to approve the agreement between LIGO and Virgo. 55 Council members voted in favor of the agreement, and 3 voted against it. We are rapidly moving ahead with the process of getting signatures on paper, and with obtaining the required endorsements from funding agencies. Meanwhile, we will be starting to work under the provisions of the agreement. The LIGO and Virgo Directorates are now working together to appoint and launch the new committees called for in the MOU and Attachment. We are also starting the planning of the agenda of the March LSC meeting, which will become the first joint meeting of the two Collaborations.

The LSC Executive Committee held a meeting on Thursday 18 January. Two observational papers were discussed and approved (with small changes), the S3/S4 known pulsar paper and the S4 stochastic "radiometer" paper. The LSC Exec Comm heard a report from Rai Weiss (chair of the Detection Committee) on the plan (soon to be proposed) for a blind detection challenge.

LIGO Laboratory Administration (Lindquist)

STATUS OF LSC MOUs (Lloyd)

MOU

Attachments

Columbia

DAT, OPS, OUT, Z

NAOJTAMA

ACF, Z

Stanford

ACF, LAS, OPS, OPT, OUT, SUS, Z

Trinity

OPT, OUT, Z


PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (Luna)

>From: Rod Luna <rluna@ligo.caltech.edu>

DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (Turner, Mak)

>From: Linda Turner - turner@ligo.caltech.edu>

>From: Cleveland Mak <mak_c@ligo.caltech.edu>

Document Management System - Plan B (Lindquist)

The Document Management System Plan B committee chaired by Joe Giaime has scheduled a Kickoff meeting Friday, January 19.

FINANCIAL SYSTEMS (Funaro, Brambila, Kaufman)

>From: "Funaro, Catherine" <Catherine.Funaro@caltech.edu>

>From: "Brambila, Ruth" <Ruth.Brambila@caltech.edu>

>From: Florence Kaufman <fkaufman>

SUBCONTRACTS MANAGEMENT (Jasnow, Salone)

>From: Gina Salone <gsalone@ligo.caltech.edu>

>From: Ed Jasnow <jasnow@ligo.caltech.edu>

PROPOSALS and REPORTS (Lindquist)

The end-of-December report for the National Science Foundation was sent at the end of last week.

The NSF notified us last week that they are scheduling a Total Business Systems Review (TBSR) of LIGO and associated Caltech business systems at Caltech February 27 through March 2.  The NSF team will be looking at the following functions:

The head of the NSF team has expressed an interest in visiting one of the sites as well.

CHANGE CONTROL/CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT (Lindquist)

HUMAN RESOURCES (Akutagawa)

>From: Cindy Akutagawa cindy@ligo.caltech.edu


Quality/Safety (Tyler)

>From: Bill Tyler tyler@ligo.caltech.edu

Safety Audits of LIGO campus labs were started this week.  The audit results so far have been good with no significant safety issues identified by the audit team.  The audit team is comprised of personnel from PMA, the Caltech Safety Office, and LIGO.


LIGO Hanford Observatory (LHO) and Interferometer Operations (Raab)

Summary of S5 Activities at LIGO Hanford Observatory  (compiled by R. Savage)

We've had colder and less variable weather this week with temperatures dropping to single digits (deg. F) and snow the past two days.  The stable weather has resulted in some 20+ hour lock stretches.  However, controlling the temperatures in the LVEA and VEAs has been difficult.  Ranges were reasonable on both H1 and H2 with duty cycles over the past seven days of 87% for H1 and 82% for H2.

We are preparing for a week of commissioning starting next Monday (1/22).  The main planned activity is commissioning of the H1 PEPI system.  Details of the planned work can be found on this wiki page.

Highlights from the weeks LHO elogs:


LIGO Livingston Observatory (LLO) and Interferometer Operations (Giaime)

S5 run (Valera Frolov):

CDS Computing (Lisa Bogue):

LIGO Science Education Center (John Thacker):

LIGO computing and network security (Roddy)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reported under General Computing, see below.

General computing and LDAS admin (Giardina)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reported under General Computing, see below

Reported under LDAS System Administration,

Data analysis & computing (Yakushin)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Storage/Condor/LDAS admin:
Reported under LDAS System Administration,

Data analysis:
Reported under Data Analysis activities, see below


Mechanical and Optical Systems (Coyne)

See Advanced LIGO


Controls and Data Systems (Bork)

From: Rolf Bork rolf@ligo.caltech.edu

LIGO:

40m Lab:

See Advanced LIGO


40-Meter Interferometer (Weinstein)

IFO commissioning, Electronics, controls, computers:

IFO modeling:

Vacuum squeezing:

Lab Infrastructure, Bake lab:


Thermal Noise Interferometer (Black)

LASTI (Ottaway)

  No report received.


CIT Science Group (Weinstein)

__________________

Eirini Messaritaki

I started working on coding, testing and incorporating the null stream veto in the follow ups used by the inspiral group.

__________________

Igor Yakushin

  • Continue working on coherent waveburst online infrastructure.
  • During the last week coherent waveburst review telecon the question was raised why all the loud triggers found by the incoherent waveburst and missed by the coherent one have strong signal in L1 and weak signal in H1 and H2. Here is a possible explanation: http://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~igor/SG235Q9.1/index.htm

__________________

Xavier Siemens

__________________

Duncan Brown

__________________

Gregory Mendell

__________________

Kent Blackburn

NOTE: Kent is at the Joint DOE/NSF Atlas/CMS software review this week. David Meyers compiled this week's report.

TCLGLOBUS:

GRID APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT:

OPEN SCIENCE GRID VALIDATION TESTBED:

OPEN SCIENCE GRID INTEGRATION TESTBED:

  Laboratory Computing (Anderson)

LDAS Software (Maros)

Testing of code to prevent the diskcacheAPI from hanging when it encounters a hung NFS file system was not successful when run on the ldas-dev system. The new code caused excessive memory usage and is being studied as to why.

Additional work on PR#2152 (providing sampleRate for PROC structures) was needed to prevent the api from generating segmentation faults. The new code now allows for the user to specify explicitly what meta data and what extended meta data should be retrieved.

Corrections for displaying multi-line variables and descriptions from within cmonClient (PR#3098).

System testing was performed using version 1.8.427 of the software. Some regression tests failed in FrDump and FrVerify. These have been associated with the system tests copying the files in ASCII mode. LJcopy has been modified to transfer the files in BINARY mode by default.

Due to cooling issues, only ldas-dev ran loop tests over the weekend. An error in running dcmangle has been corrected.

LDAS System Administration (Anderson)

Caltech

(Dan Kozak)

(Phil Ehrens)

(Erik Espinoza)

MIT

(Fred Donovan)

Livingston

(Igor Yakushin)

(Dwayne Giardina)

Hanford

(Greg Mendell)

(Ben Johnson)

General Computing (Wallace)

MIT

(Fred)

Livingston

(Shannon)

(Dwayne)

Hanford

(Christine)

CIT

(Bruce)

(Christian)

(Mike)

(Veronica)

(Larry)

Advanced LIGO and Supporting R&D (Shoemaker)

Advanced LIGO Systems

From: Hiroaki Yamamoto hiro@ligo.caltech.edu

Modeling and Simulation (Hiro Yamamoto)

modeling and simulation (Hiro Yamamoto)

-----------------------------------------------------------

e2e weekly meeting

----------------------------

Mark Barton summarized the latest designs of the quad suspensions.

Andrew Kinchen (SLU) talked about the study of the effect of the back reaction of the HAM-SAS.Fast simulation of Dual Recycled Michelson Cavity (Hiro, Keiko)

Keiko finished her visitor program and went back to Japan at the end of last year.Her work, fast calculation of field evolution using the time domain modal model, will be reported in a LIGO note in a few weeks.Static IFO simulation (Hiro, Melody)

Hiro has modeled a 3D BS, and talked about the preliminary result at the COC meeting on 17th.More details are studied to find the true requirement to set the limit of the loss to be around 100ppm.Melody is working the data management part of the code.Modeler - e2e simulation engine (Hiro, Bruce, Melody)

Bruce has finished the implementation of the UserDefinedPrimitive code.Bruce and Melody are validating this implementation.Melody is reviewing and update the e2e primitive manual.Mechanical Simulation for advanced LIGO (Sany and SLU team)

Andrew summarized his HAM-SAS study with a realistic ground motion signal as input to the base and a triple suspension on top of the table. He is going to present the result in this week's telecon.

We continued e2e modeling of AdvLIGO Input Mode Cleaner locking. Using a very simplified control filter, we worked on the frequency control path. To mimic the effect of frequency control, we fed back the frequency servo signal to MC2 optic directly. (In this way we can change the cavity length instantaneously. Currently, the e2e package does not have a mechanism to change the laser frequency as a function of time.) For white noise disturbance applied to MC3 triple suspension?s suspension point, we confirmed that the cavity was locked stably.

Continued modeling AdvLIGO Input Mode Cleaner locking. Using the pseudo-frequency control (feeding back the error signal from RF Demodulator to MC2 optic via frequency control path so that the optic moves instantaneously), measured the open loop transfer function. Excitation signal (swept sine) was injected immediately before the control filter and compared the signals before and after this junction point. The result appears reasonable. More analysis will follow.

Resumed the e2e modeling of modal control that we started last summer. By converting the simulink model developed by Laurent Ruet to an e2e file, examined the yaw control. An impulse input was fed to the suspension point and the optic?s motion was monitored. When the control loop was open (i.e., free hanging), the spectrum of the optic?s motion seems reasonable. However, when the loop was closed, the system appeared to be unstable. The problem is currently being investigated.

CDS

AdvLigo:

Ham-Sas:

ISI:

Triple controls:

ISC:

Prestabilized Laser

From: Peter King <pking@ligo.caltech.edu>

Still trying to get a hold of the Beckhoff sales people, who seem to like not answering their phone, replying to e-mails ...  etc.  Just as I was typing I finally got an answer about the pricing and availability of their analog and digital modules.  The parts will be used to replicate the front-end interface and I will be trying to establish the communication between the Beckhoff control and EPICS.

I received pricing information from Innolight about the customised 2-W NPRO that will be used for the front-end laser.

Seismic Isolation

From: Ken Mason kmason@ligo.mit.edu

ISI Single Stage HAM isolation system

A PDR for the single stage ham isolation system was conducted at HPD in Boulder, CO on Jan 11,2007. We were pleased with the overall design and analysis work by HPD and agreed to move forward with the design presented.

ISI two stage BSC isolation system

A problem was encountered in the design of the second stage. ASI aligned the stage 1-2 horizontal actuators with the upper ZMP of the flexure instead of the lower ZMP. This resulted in a large amount of cross coupling. Laurent Ruet is redesigning the actuator mounts to move the actuator into its correct position.

Fabrice Matichard has calculated new shim dimensions for two sets of shims. 1 set is for the corrected load, with no height change for the upper and lower zero moment points of the flexure. A second set is being made for the corrected load, with a best guess correction for the new lower zero moment shim. Shims have been ordered and should be in next week.

We have received quote for cleaning and air baking the 9 large machined parts. Both valid quotes are very high as each supplier needs to build or modify an oven and additional clean room upgrades. We are looking into the possibility of using the oven built by Galli & Morelli for this air bake.

 

From: Brian Lantz <BLantz@stanford.edu>

Meeting notes from the SEI telecon
Friday, Jan 12, at 2 pm eastern, 1pm central, 11 am pacific, etc.

Announcements
HAM SAS arrived, to be installed next week

HAM contract status
  - PDR was Thursday, Jan 11,
    It went well, we generated a big action item list.

Progress on the BSC
  - compliance measurements?
Stage 1 is still rubbing. However, some estimates can be made from the measurements on the two free corners. Based on these measurements, two new sets of shims will be made. 1 set will be for the corrected load, with no height change for the upper and lower zero moment points of the flexure. A second set will be made for the corrected load, with a best guess correction for the new lower zero moment shim, based on the two free corners. All 3 lower zero moment point shims will be the same size.

  - stage 2 actuators in the wrong place
ASI put the stage 0-1 horizontal actuators at the upper zero moment point of the flexure, rather than the lower zero moment point. We suspect they did this because the spring is at the lower zero moment point. This puts the actuator about 6 cm too high. It's not yet clear how much we can move the actuator down before things get very complicated. A quick look at the easm files seem to indicate a few cm is easy, but we need to take a close look at the real CAD files and hardware.

  - additional space cap sensors?
Ben Abbott is working on gettting some spares. Based on Ben A's conversations with ADE - If we put a new readout onto an existing head, the calibration will be incorrect, because there is a reference cap on the board, which only has a 5% tolerance. This can cause both an offset and a scale factor error. The offset can be as much as 10% (Based on Ben's recollection). This means that if a readout breaks, we can replace the readout, but we will need to redo the tilt decoupling measurement to calibrate out the scale factor error.
 
Ben will send Rich M an email to see if he wants a spare head, also.

Has ordered 2 spare, in-air, cables.

  - powersupply saga
Ground pin was touching the case and causing ground loops and lots of noise.
Jay has new drawing for backplane, will be tested in the HAM single stage
Voltages were not correct in the old board, but the voltage-setting resistors were changed, and now it's all working.

  - pods at LLO - clamps/ lockers
According to Joe Hanson, clamps should be in from Southern on Monday 1/15
need 9 more locking-feet jam nuts for the GS-13s,

  - Seismometer testing
We still need a test box to mimic seismometer, to test the computer wiring, and we still need a test stand to test the seismometer. We'd like to be able to test the seismometer in the pod, before installation on the platform. The interface of the test box and the test stand should be that they plug directly into one another. It would be smart to also make a cable assembly so that we could test the seismometer with the test stand before the pod was fully assembled.

Ben A will write up a little description of how this will look, and Brian L will check it. We want it when clean equipment comes back. Will try to get this in the next month. (mid Feb.) before the ISI interface box is done. That way we can use it to test the ISI interface box, and we can use it to get the seismometer pods tested.

  - cleaning
Ken Mason still in transit, unable to report

Feedforward at Stanford
  - nothing to report

Seismometry and Corner station SPI

Tarm back, changing over to optical sensors, and some other mechanical issues. Hope to  finish machining in the next few days.

From: Dennis Coyne <coyne@ligo.caltech.edu>

HAM-SAS status, 1/18

The HAM-SAS unit has been placed into the HAM chamber at LASTI, without the optics table and its payload (as yet). Some of the cabling (the cabling which has limited access once installed) has been installed/routed on the HAM-SAS structure. The remaining cabling should arrive at LASTI next week, when Ben Abbott arrives to complete the electronics installation.

The support tube elevations and tilt will be adjusted today (1/18), by using the scissors tables on the piers, to level the baseplate which supports the inverted pendulums. The HAM optics table and its ersatz payload (weights) could be placed on the HAM-SAS unit tomorrow. We will then release the inverted pendulums and begin to tune the frequency of the IPs and the vertical filters.

From: Ben Abbott abbott_b@ligo.caltech.edu

All new activity since last weekly is written in red.

HAM-SAS:
Custom Electronics chassis: (# needed + #spares)


Commercial Electronics:

Miscellaneous:

ISI:

Suspensions

From: Janeen Romie <janeen@ligo-la.caltech.edu>

(Rupal Amin)

From: k mailand kmailand@ligo.caltech.edu

Core Optics

Auxiliary Optics

From: Michael Smith smith@ligo.caltech.edu

COST UPDATE

SLC

From: Phil Willems <willems@ligo.caltech.edu>

Advanced LIGO Photon Calibrator

-------------------------------

I have been polishing off the Design Requirements Document and Conceptual Design Document for the Advanced LIGO Photon Calibrator. 

The design requirements document and conceptual design document for the Advanced LIGO Photon Drive are written and available for viewing at http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~willems/PC/Photon_Calibrator.html

Thermal lensing in Livingston

-----------------------------

Inspired by the good results Virgo has obtained by using the thermal drift of test mass frequencies as a measure of absorption, Sam Waldman and I (mostly Sam) have been investigating the technique for LIGO.  Using archival data for Livingston, Sam found that there is plenty of signal to noise ratio in the frequency drift after lock acquisition (see his LLO elog entry last week).  We are investigating the systematic errors and will probably try this technique at Livingston during the commissioning break, as well as the spot size measurement.

Input Optics

From: Dave Reitze reitze@phys.ufl.edu

UF Report

AdvLIGO Modulation  - Wan Wu

Stable Recycling Cavities - Muzammil Arain and Guido Mueller

Mechanical - Luke Williams

IO PDR - UF

Working on the Preliminary Design Document


For additional information about this report, contact Albert Lazzarini or Phil Lindquist