The LIGO Executive Committee Agenda for Monday, February 13, 2006 will be:
(Meeting time: 10:30 am Pacific Time)
1. Announcements
2. Comments on Weekly Report
3. LSC Issues (Saulson)
4. LIGO Lab Operations
5. R&D and Advanced LIGO (Shoemaker)
6. CHANGE CONTROL BOARD/TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD SESSION AS NEEDED
Special Items:
Preparations for Advanced
LIGO Review (Tentatively May 31 – June 2)
The S2 binary black hole paper has been accepted by Physical Review D.
Stan Whitcomb and Peter Saulson visited Virgo, and made progress in discussions with Virgo Spokesman Benoit Mours on a draft of a new MOU that will cover collaborative data analysis between the LSC and Virgo.
The sites need the appropriate forms and to be advised concerning the routing of said forms.
Open questions: when docents work with children, do we need to have background checks? How does Caltech normally handle this? Who pays?
>From: Rod Luna <rluna@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Linda Turner - turner@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Cleveland Mak <mak_c@ligo.caltech.edu>
|
Week Ending 02/09/2006 |
In |
Out |
|
Packages |
20 |
6 |
|
Faxes |
25 |
27 |
>From: "Cronin, Holly" <Holly.Cronin@caltech.edu>
>From: "Brambila, Ruth" <Ruth.Brambila@caltech.edu>
>From: Florence Kaufman <fkaufman>
>From: Gina Salone <gsalone@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Ed Jasnow <jasnow@ligo.caltech.edu>
>Irene Baldon
>Julie
Hiroto jhiroto@ligo.caltech.edu
No report.
>Dorothy Lloyd
No report.
>From: Cindy Akutagawa <cindy@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Bill Tyler tyler@ligo.caltech.edu
Nothing significant to report this week.
Summary of Commissioning Activities at LIGO
Since Monday 6th we've been moved to a commissioning mode on both machines, with experiments in the days and eves, buttoning up to join LLO at ~10pm and running in science (or near-science) mode on the graveyard shift. Thus, duty cycles since the start of the commissioning period are close to 1/3 (29% on H1, 28% on H2). The quality of the data during these evening stretches appears quite good, but for these two weeks of commissioning they should be flagged and reviewed to ensure they can be folded into full S5 analyses. A new calibration will be issued on both IFOs at the end of the commissioning effort.
Some science run and commissioning highlights are bulleted below:
We had a good week of data taking with a duty factor of 60.1 percent between
midnight 2/2/06 and 2/9/06 CST. This was
in spite of ongoing construction for the Science and
Activities included: A search for instabilities caused by WFS2 oscillations.
These ended up absolving the WFS2 loop,
but more investigation is needed, specifically of the optical lever loops. It may be that their gains need to be reset. We may also re-measure the WFS sensing matrix.
Speculations and investigations as to the source of the above budget noise
in the 50-100 Hz region. Investigations
involved exciting the end baffle of ETMX using shakers and looking for upconversions in the ETMX coil driver electronics.
There was some excitement when a 175 Hz excitation was observed in the L1:LSC-ETMY_EXC channel. This appears to be an artifact in the DAQ and
not a real signal going to the test mass.
As always the elog at
http://ilog.ligo-la.caltech.edu contains the details.
The new main gate has arrived back at the manufactures from the paint
shop. Allan and/or I will go and give it
a pre-delivery inspection tomorrow morning (Fri.)
Found no site nor laser safety concerns this
reporting period.
Working with Bill Tyler on the upcoming (April 18th) LLO
safety audit.
According to Rod Luna (CIT/LIGO) property manager, the property
audit/inventory on LLO capital equipment went fine and we will do a total site
inventory in June '06
Preparing a tutorial on how to analyze LIGO Seismic data
using Matlab and Ligotools.
1) Added 5 new Condor users.
2) We have just been told by a structural engineer that the second floor
cannot carry the weight of the current LDAS installation. The new plan is to
build an LDAS room downstairs in a double open bay. We still plan to move LDAS
from a temporary location at the end of March.
3) Generated couple possible very preliminary layouts of LDAS equipment in the new location (there are too many unknowns at the moment: the exact dimensions of the space allocated for LDAS, the footprint of the fire suppression and power equipment, etc):
http://www.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~igor/POWER_HVAC_LAYOUT/v6
http://www.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~igor/POWER_HVAC_LAYOUT/v7
The second layout allocates more
space for the LDAS room at the expense of the corridor.
1) Participated in the burst face to face meeting at CIT to discuss what
needs to be done to present S4 and first few months of S5 results at the March
LSC and April APS meetings. The current deadline is that most of the work
should be finished and submitted to the reviewers by Feb 19.
2) Continue testing the modified version of WaveBurst.
3) Summarized the loud triggers found so far by WaveBurst
S5 online analysis in the burst notebook:
http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/cgi-bin/bag-enote.pl?nb=burs5inspect&action=view&page=1 4)
Took scimon owl shifts on Feb 5, 6.
see also the CDS weekly meeting minutes in the commissioning archives
Rolf Bork
Waiting on software requirements for PEPI (piezo-electric pre-isolation) controls at LHO. Hopefully, we will get something from the commissioning crew in the next day or two.
Nothing significant – see the CDS weekly minutes
John Zweizig
This week I looked into the effect of glitching in the OSEM sensors, especially on H2. I found sensor glitches by looking through the second trends for single-second periods with anomalously high sigma. These were seen to correlate strongly with glitches in the AS_Q channel in the H2 ITMX and ITMY, UL and LL sensors. Other sensor channels didn't seem to have a noticeable correlation. I haven't yet determined why these channels affect the AS_Q channel whereas others don't. The sensor glitches are tabulated with a more complete description of this study at http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~jzweizig/S5_Data_Quality/#h2sensors
Noriyasu Nakagawa from TAMA is visiting for 3 weeks to learn about our digital control system. Please make him welcome!
There was a meeting of the 40m Technical Advisory Committee this Thursday 2/9/06. These slides were shown.
A draft of the paper on the measurement of the 40m transfer function, with comparison to the theoretical prediction, is being circulated.
No report.
LASTI Weekly (Ruet, Corbitt,
Innerhoffer, Ottaway, Hoskens, MacInnes, Mason,
Shapiro, Mittleman)
The in-vacuum installation is nearly complete. Both experiments (Ponderomotive and Suspension sensor noise) have been course
aligned and fringes observed. It is anticipated that we will be under vacuum
again by Tuesday of next week.
The optical fiber that ports the light to Yend HAM
was succesfully installed and tested.
The amplifier modelling code is nearing completion
and the the CEO optical amplifer
has arrived, testing of this will start once we get the appropriate chiller (~2
weeks)
We have made some nice progress on the adaptive FIR controller. The application is the excess 10Hz noise at the top of the BSC piers. There have been some issues involving feed back to the feed forward sensors which I think we are over coming. There are a series of recent log entries on the Lasti ilog detailing our work. The most recent is on 2/8/06 (Wednesday).
Continued analysis on the effect of MC1 misalignment on MC transmitted
beam's translational and pointing fluctuation.
Derived analytical expressions of transmitted beams' translational and
rotational shifts as functions of MC1 position and yaw
misalignments. The resultant expressions indicate that with a realistic range
of misalignments and perfectly working MC length sensing and alignment sensing
controls on MC2, both MC1 position and yaw fluctuations have much greater
effects on MC transmitted beam's translational (horizontal) shift than pointing
(yaw) fluctuation. Optical power coupling to higher order modes based on the
translational beam shifts estimated in this fashion show the same order of
magnitude as previous numerical estimation of MC transmitted power fluctuation
based on e2e modeling.
Monica:
Feedback filters implemented in the control plant of the e2e 40m model have
been tested again in MATLAB : it was found a problem
with the gains, now fixed. The DARM open
loop transfer function has been simulated again using the servo with the
corrected gains and a comparison with raw data has been also done: the matching
is good for the UGF and the optical spring peak; the RSE peak doesn't match
well because of the dependence of the demodulation phase. The TF calculated using e2e was not quite the
same as the 40m data, and it is reanalyzed using same definition.
Osamu:
Osamu is implementing digital controllers in the 40m model. Based on his
feedback, Hiro is modifying e2e package to make the
analysis easier.
Modification of the QuadFP is still in progress so
that the high power stability and alignment design can be done in a realistic
environment.
Started to develop the code of Static IFO Simulation, adv.LIGO version of FFT. Designing the program frame work and adding
fundamental building blocks.
Bruce:
Melody:
Brown:
Worked on S5 online BNS analysis analysis and
maintenance issues:
Set up web pages for top ten loudest inspiral
glitches in each IFO, which are automatically updated daily:
http://ldas-jobs.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~inspiralbns/glitches/l1-glitches.html
http://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~inspiralbns/glitches/h1-glitches.html
http://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~inspiralbns/glitches/h2-glitches.html
Analyzed S5 inspiral hardware injections performed
since Jan 15:
http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/cgi-bin/enote.pl?nb=iags5sim&action=view&page=4
Reduced the latency of the online BNS search so triggers
are displayed in InspiralMon with a latency of ~ 4 mins rather than 1 hour. Set up a trigger database at the
observatories for easy retrieval of online inspiral
triggers. Moved the search from my user
account to the inspiralbns user account.
Worked with Lisa to fix problems with the ringdown software injections. Worked with Diego to track
down problems in the spinning waveform injection code. Started review of S3/S4 inspiral analysis.
Cleaned up some of the XML writing code in LAL to
reduce output file size. Worked
with Kipp Cannon to improve the XML reading and
writing code in glue for trigger post-processing.
Chatterji:
Mandic:
I have written a new draft of the companion document to the S4 all-sky
stochastic paper. I have also put together a summary of the routines used in
the analysis. These documents are meant to be of help to the review committee.
I have generated a plot showing the current results and projected S5
sensitivities to stochastic GW background, as a function of the spectral slope
alpha.
I am working on estimating the sensitivity of AdvLIGO
(in different configurations) to the stochastic signal due to the LMXB's.
Mendell:
I have checked into the lalapps/src/pulsar/StackSlide
directory of the lscsoft CVS repository updates of tcl and matlab scripts that do
condor DAG generation and post-processing of the xml output of the StackSlide code. The changes made improve formatting of
various things, but do not change anything about how the pipeline works or the
numbers that come out from it. Tomorrow's code review and the final SFT
generation at UWM will allow an S4 production run to begin soon. Recent example
S4 results have been posted on the pulsar group's S4 investigations page, under
the StackSlide section (with the usual restrictions):
http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/pulgroup/investigations/
s4index.html#stackslide
Shawhan:
Sutton:
I spent this week editing the network analysis paper, and modifying the
network codes to allow choice of analysis mode (search or veto). I also reviewed a new paper by Marka et al. on parabolic encounters in globular clusters
as GW sources, and sent detailed comments.
Yakushin:
1) Participated
in the burst face to face meeting at CIT to discuss what needs to be done to
present S4 and first few months of S5 results at the March LSC and April APS
meetings. The current deadline is that most of the work should be finished and
submitted to the reviewers by Feb 19.
2) Continue
testing the modified version of WaveBurst.
3) Summarized
the loud triggers found so far by WaveBurst S5 online
analysis in the burst notebook:
http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/cgi-bin/bag-enote.pl?
nb=burs5inspect&action=view&page=1
LDAS
LDAS continues to be ported to 64bit Solaris. After e-mail exchanges with
the Tcl development team, efforts shifted from using
GCC to Sun Studio 11 for the 64-bit compilation. Most of the core utilities in
/ ldcg used by LDAS have been compiled with this
compiler.
The looping scripts which are used for night and weekend testing of LDAS on ldas-dev have been converted to use either
username/password or X509 certificates. When running using certificates, the
job rate was observed to be almost 10% slower. This is being investigated both
at the TCL and TCLGlobus layers.
System testing for LDAS was done using ldas
version 1.8.79.
TCLGlobus
The Globus GASS Cache unit tests and documentation
have been completed.
Added a new option when creating XIO-based Tcl
channel to enable/ disable GSI authentication.
This will
benefit LDAS by allowing the study of the overhead incurred when using
authenticating vs. non- authenticating sockets.
GRID COMPUTING
Tests of the OSG 0.4.0 port of the Inspiral
pipeline have been run using OSG clusters at six sites. Three of the six sites
(50%) successfully ran the 470 DAX node test to completion with zero failures.
More details on site-specific tests can be found at: http://
osg-itb.ligo.caltech.edu/Inspiral/LIGO_OSG_040_production_sites.html
All nodes on the osg-itb test bed have been yum
updated with kernel 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4smp.
A complete re-analysis of 89% of the S4 data using the L4 dataset with an
8153 collection of DAGs has been completed. Several
restarts were required due to problems related to the RLS running out of
resources related to tape drive resources and excessive user requests. The
Condor restart mechanism worked properly and all 8153 DAG nodes have completed
with zero failures on LIGO-CIT-ITB.
The Storage Resource Manager (SRM) server has been configured with an /etc/init.d/srm script to
persist across reboots on osg-itb.se. Initial testing of the SRM server with srmcp will begin next week.
The Grid Information Provider (GIP) has been configured for LIGO-CIT- ITB
and now shows up on the GIP web page: http://rsgrid1.its.uiowa.edu/osg-gip/.
Analysis of the utility, and reliability of the GIP
(based up LDAP and GLUE) have not yet begun.
Caltech
(Phil Ehrens)
(Erik Espinoza)
-
node125, re-greased cpu. In production.
-
node410, checked cdrom drive.
It's broken w/ no replacement. In production
-
node323, ran memtest
overnight, still monitoring
-
node297, possible bad memory. running memtest
-
added lscsoft repo
-
groupinstall lscsoft
-
sync'd 32-bit install to
64-bit install
(Stuart Anderson)
MIT
(Keith Bayer)
(Igor Yakushin)
http://www.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~igor/POWER_HVAC_LAYOUT/v6
http://www.ligo-la.caltech.edu/~igor/POWER_HVAC_LAYOUT/v7
The second layout allocates more
space for the LDAS room at the expense of the corridor.
(Dwayne Giardina)
(Greg Mendell)
(Ben Johnson)
MIT
(Keith)
(Dwayne)
(
(Christine)
(Christian)
(Mike)
(Veronica)
(Larry)
From: Phil Lindquist <lindquist_p@ligo.caltech.edu>
The following documents have been prepared and
distributed:
Positions Summary List - The first step in
preparing for the Advanced LIGO Review is to review the Positions Summary List
to check whether the projected positions are consistent with expectations and
needs. We also need to know what
positions will be required to support continuing Operations activities through
the Advanced LIGO Construction effort and what positions will be available to
help with Advanced LIGO. Task managers
have been requested to review and respond by February 17.
LIGO Operations Budget Model (FY 2006 - FY 2008) -
This file is a full detailed budget projected through FY 2008. It assumes that funding will be level at $33
million in FY 2007 and FY 2008.
Operations Task Managers will be requested to review and update as
needed.
Projection of Advanced LIGO Operations Costs - This
model projects budgets through 2014 (steady state Advanced LIGO Operations)
including a summary of increments that were provided by task managers for the
June 2003 NSF Review. These estimates
have been escalated to FY 2014 dollars.
We will request a review and update by the Operations Task Managers.
Project Execution Plan - A strawman
draft Advanced LIGO PEP was distributed this week for review and update. I am requesting responses by March 3, 2006.
From: Dennis Coyne coyne@ligo.caltech.edu
from Dennis
Coyne
See also:
Records Of Decision or Agreement (RODA)
See also the RODA
status web page
Requirements/Design
Interface Issues
See the "Interfaces" section of the AL Systems web page
Residual Gas Assay (RGA)
See also the Vacuum Bake Lab
Bob Taylor
Scatter/Absorption Test Measurement System
Lee Cardenas, Liyuan Zhang, Bill Kells
We are waiting for the RIGHT parts from Laser Quantronix. Wrong Housing, part number and wrong Catalog originally sent along with the laser. Housing machined improperly for the right part number. We should get the right housing 2/9.
High-Irradiance, Contamination-Exposure Cavities
Lee Cardenas, Liyuan Zhang
Changes indicated in yellow highlight.
|
Cavity (Location) |
Material/Item |
Start |
End |
Comments |
|
Cavity #1 (OTF Lab, Bridge) |
“Cable wire” (material type?) |
~11/17 |
TBD |
Taking measurements daily. We got a HP pulse generator Model 8116A borrowed from Riccardo De Salvo. Which will be installed ASAP and returned the borrowed one to HEP. |
|
Cavity #2 (OTF Lab, Lauritsen) |
NA |
NA |
NA |
We are
reviving this Cavity after being inactive for long time. We have ordered the
proper and needed optical parts such as the 1/4 wave plate, and a polarized
cube. Optical train path as well as the optics are
defined. Looking for some new mounts and misc.. parts. New chamber in place and corresponding parts needed
are gathered for the assembly. 700 mw Laser is in place and making a complete
arrangement for the final fixed position. |
|
Cavity #3 (OTF Lab, Lauritsen) |
OSEM Flexi-circuit cable,
qty ~ 45 (Helena Armandula, SUS) supplied by Univ. Birmingham (Stuart Aston) |
~9/30 |
TBD |
taking daily absorption & ring down measurements DuPont
Flexible Circuits. The whole part to be constructed of 'flexi' i.e. no
'rigid' sections. (Stuart Aston, (document link: http://www.dupont.com/fcm/products/H-73244.pdf Coverlay (x2): Kapton (LF0110) (document link: http://www.dupont.com/fcm/products/H-73245.pdf DuPont Pyralux Series - Kapton / Acrylic Adhesive system. (document link: http://www.dupont.com/fcm/products/H-73246.pdf |
|
Queue Priority 1 |
2 Cleaned 50ppm transmission mirrors, 1 in dia., REO coated -- |
TBD |
TBD |
witness samples for the LHO vertex volume (added in 6/29/2005 vent) |
|
Queue Priority 2 |
Stepper Motor (Riccardo DeSalvo, possible SUS or ISC use) |
TBD |
TBD |
Stepper Motor sample had been placed
into Cavity #1: Power dropped from 175 mW to ~25 mW after introducing the stepper motor sample, and
continues to decrease. It is very hard to keep cavity locked. The stepper
motor may have contaminated the mirrors. Will re-test when a cvity becomes available again. To be rebaked soon using the self-heating capability of the stepper motor (not just the oven heater controls) |
From: Carol Wilkinson <wilkinson@ligo-wa.caltech.edu>
Working on HAM-SAS planning, MOUs with partners, but especially cost/schedule/risk planning.
From: Ken Mason <kmason@ligo.mit.edu>
|
Assembly
|
Status |
|
Top
Assembly Components |
Purchase
order placed with Arland Tool for all large parts.
Delivery scheduled for 2/15/2006. Schedule
slip to 3/1/2006 due to delay in receiving nitronic
60 inserts. |
|
Stage
0-1 Spring Assembly |
|
|
GS-13
Pod Assembly |
Geophones,
seismometers and lockers are in house. |
|
Stage
0-1 Kinematic Lock |
|
|
Stage
0-1 Actuator Assy.'s |
|
|
Stage
0-2 and stage 1-2 Alignment Pins |
The
design of stage 0-2 and stage 1-2 alignment pins is complete. Purchase orfer placed with Lavallee
Machine. |
From: "Joseph A.
Giaime" jgiaime@ligo.phys.lsu.edu
Agenda for the weekly SEI telecom
Friday, Feb 3, 2pm Eastern, 1pm Central, 11am Pacific
time
Announcements
BSC SEI status, Ken/
Dennis
BSC work, adaptive
modeling and FIR (Rich M)
HAM control with VME (Pradeep)
ETF platform work, thermal
testing, frame testing - Brian
Frame damping - Brian
From: Janeen Romie romie_j@ligo.caltech.edu
The quad has been received
at MIT.
Planning
travel to MIT Feb 15-22. Working on coordinating the SUS Workshop after
the LSC meeting in March. Working on the ear placement fixture. Working on the mode cleaner
spacer that is 1cm shorter.
From: Calum Torrie ctorrie@ligo.caltech.edu
The quad has now arrived
at MIT. 4 crates.
I have been working on FEA
of the structure in order to try and better understand the discrepancy between
FEA and experiment?
With Ken Mailand I have been working on the installation tooling for
LASTI.
I have now started to
arrange of the quad drawings in the vault and started to release (DCC and
vault) the remaining drawings associated with the quad.
From: Ken Mailand kmailand@ligo.caltech.edu
I've completed shop
drawings for the SUS installation, plate style fixture, and following up with
CES in the assembly, the first assembly should be
complete 2-22.
Also for Calum, I'm working on a layout option, to use the lift
table inside the LASTI BSC chamber.
From: Jay Heefner jay@ligo.caltech.edu
From: Rolf Bork
<rolf@ligo.caltech.edu>
From: Bill Kells kells@ligo.caltech.edu
From: GariLynn Billingsley Billingsley_G@ligo.caltech.edu
From: Helena Armandula ahelena@ligo.caltech.edu
While at the SPIE meeting, I met chemistry professor Jim Hamilton from the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. He was familiar with LIGO since one of his students participated on a SURF session some time ago. He developed First Contact™ , a product for cleaning and protecting precision optics and surfaces. It cleans organic residues and small particles from surfaces. First Contact™ solution applies quickly and easily, dries to a tough, flexible, elastic film, which pulls easily off the surface when the special peel tab is used. This process produces an amazing optically clean surface. For more complete information see: http://www.photoniccleaning.com/?page_id=22
I got a sample of this solution and will test it on a
3" mirror. Here is a list of the
planned tests:
Residual Gas Analysis (RGA)
The mirror, cleaned as usual, will be placed on a high
vacuum chamber where an RGA reading will be taken. The mirror will be cleaned with First
Contact™ and the RGA test will be repeated. Results will be compared.
FTIR test
After a mirror is cleaned with First Contact™, a
FTIR test will be performed and the results will be compared with FTIR results
obtained from other LIGO mirrors
Optical Absorption test
A mirror cleaned by the conventional method will be
tested at
If the results of these tests are acceptable for
Advanced LIGO, we'll have one of our biggest challenges solved. We'll only need to perfect a method of
application for our optics. A one liter
bottle cost $475.00
From: Peter King
pking@ligo.caltech.edu
I have been struggling to get the USB-based communication going with the DSP
board we have. The support from Xilinx has been less than spectacular in trying to resolve
the issue with the device driver.
A problem was found with the in-house coated mirrors. Apparently the coating was not to
specification and did not meet the requirements for the 200-W laser.
New laser crystals have arrived.
There continue to be a small series of niggling problems with the laser,
in part due to not enough spare parts being on hand.
A two-head amplifier seeded with a 2-W NPRO achieved 16 W. 33 W was achieved when four heads were used.
The diagnostic breadboard design is being re-worked. Improvements include placing the pre-modecleaner in vacuum and improving the dynamic range of
the PZT mirrors used to steer the beam into the pre-modecleaner.
The intensity of an NPRO was stabilised using an
acousto-optic modulator as the actuator.
The latest result for the relative intensity noise is an impressive
7.5E-9 at 10 Hz, with less than 4.0E-9 above 100 Hz. Problems were found with ground loops.
No new amplifiers have been built since the last laser working group telecon. They are
trying to build more 30-W front ends.
From: Michael Smith <smith@ligo.caltech.edu>
A functioning two-mirror mode-matching telescope, with spherical mirrors at
MMT2 and MMT3, was added to the IO optical train in ZEMAX, in order to study
the errant beams generated by the PRM getting misaligned. The vertex layout was
redone: the PRM wedge was reversed, so the beam heads down from the PRM to the
BS, and then rises due to the wedge in the BS. This was necessary in order to
set the beam height at the ITM to -100mm global. Dennis pointed out that the
baseline design for the ITM is -80 mm global. I will change the wedge of the
PRM again and raise the ITM beam to -80mm on the x-arm. The y-arm will be about
7mm lower. I am also redoing the vertex layout to move the APS beams and ITMXPO
to HAM6. I will attempt to eliminate HAM2 and relay all the output beams to
HAM1 and HAM6.
Luke at
Hiro is still working on obtaining transfer
functions for scattered light noise in the ADLIGO RSE configuration with the
optical spring effect.
The SLC and OPTLEV CDR must be delayed because of the changes in the vertex
layout, which effects the location of all the beam dumps and baffles; pending
design of new optical lever beams in the IO; and pending completion of an
analytical model of the scattered light noise transfer functions by Hiro.
From: Phil Willems
<willems@ligo.caltech.edu>
We have discovered a previously unreported noise injection mechanism from
thermal compensation. Power fluctuations
in the applied compensation heat can inject noise through thermorefractive
or thermoelastic effects. So far, we have only considered fluctuations
located in the vicinity of the probe beam.
For example, a heat fluctuation applied to the HR surface in the probe
beam causes an expansion of the material there, which the probe beam sees as a
displacement. In this theory, heat
fluctuations applied to the optic away from the probe beam do not contribute
noise.
However, heat fluctuations also produce stress through thermal expansion,
and this stress propagates through the whole optic at the speed of sound,
flexing it. The center of mass of the
optic does not move as it is heated. But
the position of the HR face relative to the center of mass does change, due to
the flexure. Thus, the probe beam sees
displacement noise, even though the compensation is nowhere near the probe
beam.
Preliminary calculations indicate that this may explain the discrepancy
between the measured and predicted noise coupling due to annular heating in
initial LIGO. This effect should probably
be investigated as a possible noise mechanism in GEO600, which uses a rear-face
ring heater on one end mirror.
No report this week.
For additional information about this report, contact Stan Whitcomb or Phil Lindquist