The LIGO Executive Committee Agenda for Monday August 1, 2005 will be:
(Meeting time: 10:30 am Pacific Time)
No open Change Requests
Special Items:
21 July 2005 1130 Eastern
Attendance: Bruce Allen, Patrick Brady, Joe Giaime,
Albert Lazzarini, Peter Saulson
(minutes), Rai Weiss, Stan Whitcomb, and Alan Wiseman
and guest: Jim Hough
Jim Hough reported that the Director Search Committee has held four meetings
so far, and has made good progress. They will now move to weekly meetings to
continue to make progress at a rate that will allow them to provide a list of
candidates to the LIGO Oversight Committee by the end of August at the latest.
He said that the committee had considered around eight candidates from within
the LSC and 42 from outside the LSC, in addition to which two candidates submitted
applications in response to the advertisement. Gary Sanders produced a job description
that was helpful in recognizing strengths and weaknesses of individual
candidates. The committee has now
reduced the size of its list of candidates from the LSC from the original eight
down to three. At the moment, the number of external candidates has been
reduced to 22, and more information is being sought to further the winnowing
process. (This is expected to occupy the next two or three weeks.) Joel Tohline and Kip Thorne have also written to the astrophysics
community, seeking further input. The committee hopes to present a list of no
more than six names to the Oversight Committee.
The Charter Revision Committee (David Shoemaker, Norna
Robertson, and Peter Saulson) has produced a mature
draft of the new LSC Charter. It will be sent to LSC Council members in advance
of the August LSC meeting, and will be proposed for approval at the Council
meeting. The committee has resumed work
on the Bylaws, and hopes to have a new draft for discussion by the Council in
August.
Stan Whitcomb presented a new set of templates for LSC MOUs
and Attachments. (These can be found from a link "MOU Templates" on
ligo.org.) All LSC groups (in the
Peter Saulson presented a draft of a policy
statement on how the membership lists (Attachment Z) are to be filled out. The
need for such a statement became apparent during the March MOU review, when
reviewers compared membership lists from all groups. Several LSC Exec Comm members suggested minor wording changes, most of which
were adopted. [Since the meeting, LSC
PI's have received an email including the Guidelines on Attachment Z and pointing them to
the new templates.]
Peter Saulson described the status of the drafting
of the new LSC Research White Paper. First
draft sections have arrived from DetChar, Lasers,
Optics, Advanced Interferometer Configurations, and Stochastic Analysis. [Since
the meeting a draft arrived also from the CW Analysis group.] All have been
good first tries, each with a somewhat different take on presentation of prior
accomplishments, present research program, and longer-term goals.
Joe Giaime asked whether it was appropriate to
discuss research related to pre-Advanced LIGO improvements. Saulson
said yes. Whitcomb pointed out that it is important to describe it carefully,
and to use appropriate terminology.
A lively discussion was kicked off by Patrick Brady, devoted to the question
of whether the White Paper should call out the activities of individual groups.
The issue is the possible divergence between commitments that a group has made
and the judgment (on the part of the Working Group chair, say) of whether there
has been a substantial contribution from that group. Following up on this
question was a discussion of different target audiences for the White Paper.
One such audience is the National Science Foundation; particularly, we would
like the White Paper to lay out the LSC's research
program, so that proposers can point to how their
specific proposal fits in with the overall research program. For this purpose,
it is best to give a straight narrative account of the work of the LSC as a
whole. A second audience is various committees and working groups within the
LSC itself, in particular the MOU Review Panel. In the MOU review process, a
group's accomplishments are to be compared with their commitments and with the
place of their work within the LSC's research program.
This involves frank judgments, and thus should not be made public.
One possible answer to the question was to have a public main body of the
White Paper and a private appendix in which Working Group chairs gave their
frank judgments about how contributions were being made; the latter would only
be used for internal purposes. Another possibility is to not have such
judgments be part of the White Paper at all, but just to have them be made as
part of the MOU review process.
We also discussed how the PAC will use the White Paper and the reports of
the MOU review process. The White Paper will be useful for seeing the context
of proposals within the LSC research program as a whole. The PAC will also want
to see the reports of the MOU Review Panel, to help it to make its rankings of
proposals. Some members asked whether such use of the reports of the MOU Review
Panel might mean that there would be NSF regulations to satisfy about the
composition of the MOU Review Panel, or even that its reports would need to be
supplied to the NSF.
Because of the delicacy of these issues, Rai Weiss
suggested that we ask Beverly Berger for her advice. [Since the meeting, PRS
spoke to
Patrick Brady also pointed out that our draft Charter states "The LSC will produce an annual work plan and report that will be submitted to the LIGO Directorate and subsequently be part of the LIGO Annual Report and Work Plan." This calls for regular updating of the White Paper, but doesn't require any particular information about the contributions of specific groups.
>From: Ed Chargois <chargois_e@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Linda Turner - turner@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Cleveland Mak <mak_c@ligo.caltech.edu>
|
Week Ending 07/28/05 |
In |
Out |
|
Packages |
13 |
10 |
|
Faxes |
19 |
16 |
>From: Esther Cunningham <esther@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: "Brambila, Ruth" <Ruth.Brambila@caltech.edu>
>From: Florence Kaufman <fkaufman>
>From: Gina Salone <gsalone@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Ed Jasnow <jasnow@ligo.caltech.edu>
>Irene Baldon
>Julie
Hiroto jhiroto@ligo.caltech.edu
>Dorothy Lloyd
A written summary of the document management committee’s findings and recommendation has been prepared, reviewed by the members of the committee, and distributed to the executive committee.
>From: Cindy Akutagawa <cindy@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Bill Tyler tyler@ligo.caltech.edu
No report.
Coming back online after the swap of the H1 ITMX, gate valves were opened
Monday morning, and the 4k full IFO was locked in detect mode. Progress
was made until a magnitude 5.6 quake
struck
Partial vents had been successful in the past, freeing small optics that were apparently hung up by static charge. This had not been tried before on large optics. First such attempts to burp gas into mid and end stations failed to free the optics, and next, shaking was tried. We shook with PZT fine actuators (+/-40 microns from 10Hz down to 1/2 Hz), moving but not freeing the MY ETM. Next, the Ryan/Worden method of sitting astride the crossbeam structures and shimmying, with a concurrent partial vent, freed first H1 ETMX, then H2 ETMY. Thursday, H1 ITMY was also unstuck by the same procedure. This fine piece of work saved us three vents and weeks of pumpdown time.
Read a summary of MY and EX shaking experiments, and John's conjecture that shaking is insufficient and pressure matters.
All gate valves had been reopened by Thursday late afternoon. H2 has been routinely relocking, and H1 has also just fully relocked. Thus at first glance it appears all three masses are in good working order. We must confirm this with low noise spectra.
LHO hosted the two-week WSU Tri-Cities course for teachers, "The Nature of Scientific Inquiry," between 7/11 and 7/22. The instructor is LEN member Judy Morrison. Our July WYP event was a showing of "Time Travel." August events: Perseid Meteor Shower viewing and the annual Public Lecture, given this year by Nergis Mavalvala.
No report.
see also the CDS weekly meeting minutes in the commissioning archives
no report
Rich Abbott
Jay Heefner
Refl Beam Stabilization
Ben Abbott
LSC RFPD:
John Zweizig
This week I have been working at LLO to perform the same upgrades as were done 2 weeks ago at LHO. So far, the new copper-cable switch has been installed and the GigE interfaces have been replaced in the frame builders and the two DMT Blade-1k machines. We expect to receive the additional interface cards needed for the new Opteron (poplar) and for delaronde today.
The Opteron (V40Z) machine had already been installed by Tom Evans when I arrived. I have since reinstalled its operating system and have done most of the steps needed to tailor it for use as a DMT machine.
Still remaining for this week is to set up the mirror of the DMT and development software from LHO, and to transition to the new configuration where the server machine (clearwater) is separated from the communications duties (to be retained by delaronde) and the remaining Blade-1k and Opteron machines are used for processing exclusively.
Peter King
Dave Grimmett and I have been testing ISS S/N #116, following the test procedure and recording the measured results. I hope to give Rich some feedback about the test procedure; omissions, typos ... etc to help converge on a configuration a little sooner.
Dennis Coyne
Liyuan Zhange, Lee Cardenas, Bill Kells continue to measure absorption scans of the ITM07 (formerly H1 ITMx) but have yet to explain the observed high in situ absorption by the preliminary HR and AR scans. A bulk absorption scan is next.
Helena Armandula
A piece of the baffle glass was cut and sent for XPS-ESCA anaysis to Charles Evans and Associates. Samples for FTIR will be taken next week. JPL will perform the test.
Since our last report, we have finished
balancing the new mirrors in the North Arm Cavity (NAC), installed the shadow
sensors in NAC, installed and balanced the new mirrors in the South Arm Cavity
(SAC), installed the shadow sensors in SAC, and begun alignment of both
cavities with the NPRO laser.
On the bond-noise experiment, Akira and Rick
have identified the dominant noise sources, and they are able to accurately
model the noise floor over a wide range of frequencies. The noise floor is, for
the most part, a combination of electronic noise in the PZT driver, multiplied
by the unusually-shaped transfer function of the PZT actuator, shot noise in
the photodetector, and electronic noise in the
photocurrent measurement circuit. Attached is a plot of the measured noise
floor of the instrument (black curve) and a model of the sum in quadrature of these three noise sources (red curve).
We are now in the process of reducing this
noise floor.

This week the power supply failed with the warning message HOTHSINK. After various restart attempts failed we replaced the Lambda power supply with the Lightwave Power Supply and the problem was fixed. Efforts continued to fully shakedown the LASTI PSL in preparation for our upcoming experiments
We have requested that the second triple modecleaner prototype be sent to LASTI to be installed facing the existing one. This will allow us to perform a series of tests that will investigate various control schemes with significantly improved displacement sensitivity. Principally we plan to test the performance of Laurent's modal estimator control law.
A lot of time was spent investigating the appropriated method for the cleaning of the solid spacer. In the end it was decided to follow initial LIGO large structure cleaning protocols with the addition of a pre-procedure acid etch to compensate for the lack of complete polishing of the surfaces. The cleanliness standard that will be adopted is 86a/100.
Sany Yoshida described his e2e simulation work on the effect of Violin Modes in a locked cavity.
(Hiro & Biplab)
Keita's SURF student is running e2e to study Output Mode Cleaner and found the
mode spacing simulated by e2e is different from a naive Modal Model
calculation. Hiro and Biplab
is working to solve this.
(Monica) I'm replacing old bundles with new alfi-bundles:
the e2e package for the 40m is now
easier to read. I'm also studying the LSC code implemented by Matt in his
Advanced LIGO E2E package in
order to improve my control plant.
(Biplab) Used the 'FFTprop'
matlab code for beam propagation that uses 'Adaptive Grid Size' method to write a code
for the Advanced LIGO arm cavity where
beam-radius may vary from 6cm to 1cm (unlike in LIGO I cavity where beam radius stays within
3.5-4.0cm everywhere). Next task is to compare it with ordinary FFT
propagation. Probably it allows more computational speed because the needed
number of pixels would be less than ordinary FFT propagation.
(Hiro) Still working on the
coding of the fast dual recycling module as the primary programming. FFT
design is also going discussing with interested people, including Ken Ganezer.
(Bruce-last-week)
(Bruce-this-week)
(Melody) Continuing with fixing the PRs. Fixing PR 415. Investigated possible solutions for PR 483 -
"check into new way to display java remotely".
The LDAS 1.7.0 release is being pushed out today. This release has better
RDS creation performance and several fixes to the diskCacheAPI.
Over the weekend, a new issue with threads disappearing in the diskCacheAPI was discovered at LHO.
The case of this was (and still is) unknown, only that it didn't occur in
the 1.6.0 release of LDAS. A workaround to detect the disappearing thread has
been added and been shown to properly behave in the few cases where this
problem has occurred after the detection code was added. We will be working
hard to learn the source of these disappearing threads.
An issue was discovered in the controlMonitorAPI
whereby it is mapping all users for certain commands onto a staff developer's
LDAS account. The source of this has been tracked down. A problem report has
been filed and a fix has been proposed for the next release.
A total of 64 functions from globus_gass_transfer.h
have been SWIG-wrapped. Of these, 35
functions (client-initiated, send/receive bytes, and set/get attributes) have
been tested.
Fixed GASS Transfer register get/put/append SWIG-wrapped
functions because they were incorrectly SWIG-wrapped in the first time.
Still modifying GASS Transfer server-initiated test case.
GASS Transfer server implementation has to be written from scratch since there
is no mechanism to create server object like the one in XIO or I/O package.
Added 10 Robodoc function
documentation for GASS Transfer.
LIGO was well represented at the OSG Roll-Out event in
SDSS and other new members joining since the humble
beginnings of GriPhyN and iVDGL.
The OSG council and interim executive board met on Friday to review preproposals and discuss funding for OSG.
The iVDGL annual report is due this week. LIGO has
been asked to present its activities as a Tier II center, activities and
involvement in OSG and experiences running applications on the OSG in the
report.
The LIGO CIT ITB test site has been added to the collection of ITB sites
that are tested daily with a Grid Exerciser (gridex)
managed by the OSG consortium. The statistics from gridex
have demonstrated several problems with file permissions and Condor
configuration which have resulted in errors in the Condor log. Most of these
have been tracked down in the last week and eliminated.
An initial test of executing a simple Globus job,
on the thirteen sites recognized as online on the GridCat
ITB web site, returned proper results on twelve out of the thirteen resource
providers.
A LIGO investigator produced a detailed explanation of an inspiral work flow based upon an OSG demo. Future work will
be to use the Pegasus planner and the inspiral custom
code to develop a LIGO grid application that can run on OSG ITB sites that
support both Condor and VDS. The url
for showing the results of submitting the inspiral
search code onto the OSG Grid is: http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/lscdatagrid/griphynligo/osg_demo.html.
Work has begun in reviewing the code and documentation in the Virtual Data
System (VDS) as some components of the VDS are required for the inspiral work flow. This primarily involves learning how to
use the Pegasus application from ISI.
(Dan Kozak)
(Stuart Anderson)
(Keith Bayer)
(Igor Yakushin)
(Greg Mendell)
(Ben Johnson)
(Greg Mendell)
There were StackSlide code reviews in the past
week. These took place July 22 and 28
2005at 9:15 PDT. The StackSlide
review page is posted here (access is as per the usual PULG investigations
pages):
http://www.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~gmendell/PULG/StackSlideUtilities/review/StackSlideReviewPage.html
(Igor Yakushin)
(Peter Shawhan)
(
After further optimization of the code, began running on ldas-pcdev1 and on
real data with real glitches. Quite a
few bugs with normalization and threshold found, worked very closely with Shourov all week on these.
Consequences of these simulations not clear yet; need to understand what
the glitches are doing.
(Keith)
(
(Christine)
(Christian)
(Mike)
(Veronica)
(Bruce Sears)
(BS) Ilog Development: (1.0 days)
(Larry)
from Carol
Wilkinson
Progress updates for Advanced LIGO subsystem development for the period from May 1 to June 30 have been completed and are available on-line. Sub-system leaders will be asked to work up Estimate-to-Complete the development portions of their sub-systems – due end of July.
Meetings & Reviews
Future near term planned meetings & reviews are indicated in the table below.
AOS Stray Light Control DRR/CDR has been delayed from Sept. 28 to ~Oct 19.
|
Date |
Subsys |
Review |
Topic(s) |
Enabling event(s) |
Schedule motivation |
|
|
Jul 7 |
SEI |
BSC Critical Design Review 3 |
review basic requirements, interfaces & dynamic
coupling |
available analysis/reports |
timely decision on proceeding with SEI/BSC prototype for
LASTI for integration with the SUS quad prototype |
Report in progress |
|
Jul 11-13 |
SYS |
SYS Mtg |
|
|
Report in progress |
|
|
12-Jul |
SUS |
PDR, Review 2 |
Electronics req & design;
Focus is on the front end electronics ( |
|
|
Report in progress |
|
Jul 19 |
ISC/40m |
40m DC Readout Review |
DC readout experiment |
|
|
Report in progress |
|
~Aug, 05 |
SEI |
HAM Critical Design Review |
Recommendations w.r.t. HAM prototype development based on ETF results |
Completion of SEI/BSC critical design reviews; LSC review of ASI HAM configuration design |
timely decision on proceeding with SEI/HAM prototype |
|
|
~Sep |
SUS |
PDR, Review 3 |
Quad design |
Completion of the quad controls prototype assembly; |
timely transfer, to RAL & UB efforts, of lessons learned from the controls prototype |
|
|
~Nov |
SUS |
PDR, Review 4 |
Quad Installation |
Completion of installation at LASTI |
Inform the |
|
|
~Dec |
SUS |
PDR, Review 5 |
Triple design |
Available SUS/US staff |
Enable SUS/US final design phase |
|
|
~Feb |
SUS |
PDR, Review 6 |
quad controls prototype test results |
completion of LASTI testing |
timely incorporation into final design effort on the noise prototype |
|
|
TBD |
SUS |
PDR, Review 7 |
BS, FM/ITM SUS design |
design work completion (has yet to start on FM/ITM, not mature for RM) |
|
|
|
~Oct 19 |
AOS |
Stray Light Control, DRR/CD |
|
SYS PDR? |
primavera late finish 6/15/05 |
|
|
TBD |
AOS |
Thermal Comp., DRR/CD |
|
SYS PDR? |
|
|
|
~Oct |
SYS |
PDR, Review 1 |
Engineering & Implementation ('generic') Requirements; |
completion of generic requirements definition; completion of first draft of ICD; revision to optical layout; establish integrated opto-mechanical equipment layout |
timely system level definition enables/helps define subsystem reqmnts & design |
|
|
~Dec |
SYS |
PDR, Review 2 |
CDS Infrastructure |
Sufficient CDS requirements & concept work (also
7/11-13 mtg) |
CDS Infrastructure is key to subsystem electronics req. |
|
|
~Sep |
IO |
PDR Review 1 |
Faraday Isolator |
SYS PDR? |
|
|
|
~Jan |
IO |
PDR Review 2 |
Electro-Optic Modulator |
|
|
|
|
~Mar |
IO |
PDR Review 3 |
Mode Matching Telescope |
Determination of whether a stable recycling cavity will
become part of the |
|
|
|
~Oct |
COC |
PDR Review 1 |
Metrology |
Review and
select vender and in-house metrology |
|
|
|
TBD |
COC |
PDR Review 2 |
|
SYS PDR? |
|
|
From: Ken Mason kmason@ligo.mit.edu
We have met again with ASI on the redesign required to soften the springs. They are working on a quote which they expect to have to us this week. They are aware we are looking for a completion by 9/1/2005.
A requisition has been submitted for the seismic/quad test stand.
Parts have been received to complete and test the blade calibration
From: "Joseph A. Giaime"
jgiaime@ligo.phys.lsu.edu
Weekly SEI meeting, 22 July 05
Announcements:
LASTI lab work
Addressing the HAM SEI structure resonance issue, there are a number is useful log entries:
Ken has put bellows into his BSC FE model. Putting the 'dirt' below the slab is still in progress.
Electronics: Jay awaits our choice on which electronics design we want to try first on the modified GS-13.
From: Janeen
Romie <romie_j@ligo.caltech.edu>
Advanced LIGO Suspensions
Stuart Aston from the
We had a discussion with Calum, Stuart, Jay, Mohana, Bob and Helena on wiring up the electrostatic drive. Jay will create a wiring diagram for Bob to use. He’s researched soldering method to use with the gold mask that does not use flux. He’s buying a sample of a gold coated fused silica optic from Edmund Scientific to use as a test piece.
The spacer parts for the mode cleaner at LASTI are with Bob Taylor for cleaning and baking.
Had a meeting with Dennis, Oddvar and Calum on taking over on the installation fixture design and fabrication while Oddvar is on leave. We will meet with local machine shops to get an idea of the cost and schedule. Most shops now accept Solidworks parts files, along with a partially dimensioned drawing, so that will help things along.
Had a meeting about sending the second mode cleaner triple to LASTI.
Helena and I organized all of the hardware and tools in the Synchrotron lab last week.
From: Jay Heefner jay@ligo.caltech.edu
Began layout drawings for LASTI quad controls using LIGO-like controls. The system will be based on PCI ADCs and DACs and should be much less expensive than our present VME- based systems.
Continued discussions with David Blair concerning digital controls for their SOSs and cavity length and alignment controls.
From: Ken mailand
kmailand@ligo.caltech.edu
Making simplified S/W drawings of the Adv. LIGO optical component assemblies for import to Zmax, for Mike Smith, and converting Mechanical Desktop LHO full site layout to S/W
From: Bill Kells <kells@ligo.caltech.edu>
Still working hard this week on the parametric instability
issue(s). Finished a review of
one of the
From: Peter King pking@ligo.caltech.edu
I received a new quotation for the 300 mW Innolight Mephisto OEM version. The labor hours and costs are being re-worked, without reference to the existing cost book. The estimates are based on VME hardware and our current implementation of cross-connects as that is the best thing I can base such numbers on. Given our current emphasis on documentation and testing, their allocation has been included in the labor estimate.
From:
Michael Smith <smith@ligo.caltech.edu>
Ben Abbott hooked up the electronics for the QPD, and we are reading X-Y voltages from the QPD when the input beam is moved in angle. Aabeg has modeled the addition of an input telescope for changing the input spot size. The beam will be expanded by the ratio 5/3 to produce a 2mm beam waist at the output of the Oplev 3, 14meter EFL receiver lens.
The AOM modulator approach was abandoned because we didn't have the proper driver to modulate the beam intensity. Instead, Shasta is using a conventional chopper wheel to modulate the intensity. She is in the process or re-aligning the optical paths to correspond with the un-deflected beam through the chopper.
From: Riccardo DeSalvo desalvo@ligo.caltech.edu
Marco and John
Gave a presentation of the MH interferometer workings and recent results. From now on Marco is on strict writing mode (Amaldi paper, LIGO talk, LSC presentation and finally his thesis. John will take over in the interim in the lab’s operations.
Tomorrow Juri will give a rehersal of his SPIE presen tation on the MH interferometer. We will also have a meeting with Jeam Marie Mackowsky (visiting Caltech) on the future of the MH project.
Barbara
Back for the week to finalize the Amaldi paper with Marco, Juri and Riccardo.
John
I tested and refined the new data acquisition program by taking some frequency spectra. The new mode matching design was completed. The two lens solution has been abandoned in favor of a simpler one lens option. This solution is thought to be more stable and will be simpler to implement. The lens required has been ordered from CVI. All cavity mirrors were analyzed by Garilynn Billingsley. It was found that both flat mirrors (and possibly the MH mirror) were deformed due to pressure from their mounts. A solution has been designed and will be tested this week once the flooring has been removed from the sub-basement.
Justin, Sean,
Last week we finally successfully loaded a 1kg test mass on the lower mono-crystalline silicon flex joint. In doing so we have found that the quality factor ratio for silicon maraging is 5.78. This is surprising because eliminating one of the joints should have halved the losses and doubled the Q factor. Evidently the bottom joint that we changes was hosting much of the losses for the investigated (modified violin) mode) Next week we will attempt to loading the 1kg test mass on both the upper and lower silicon flex joints.
Juri
I modified my FFT simulation program to model a folded three mirrors cavity. In this way we can run more realistic simulations for studying the behavior of our Mexican hat cavity. In particular we can study the effect of the misalignment of the three mirrors on the resonant modes of the cavity and compare the simulated results with the experimental data. Moreover I’m including in the simulation program the measured mirror maps for both the input and the folder mirror. Using these maps, we want to analyze the impact of the mirrors deformation, due to the mechanical mounting, on the beam shape.
Alberto
I’m still waiting for my pieces from the manufacturers and I hope to have them in the next few days. Then we will be able to begin the setup of the apparatus. Meanwhile I’m studying the way to build the arm according to the transfer function of the system in order to obtain the right counterbalance of the payload. Because of the complexity of the calculations involved Ilaria and I are going to make a numerical estimation of the same transfer function via an ANSYS simulation and then do a comparison between the results. We would like to have a faster way to predict the reactions of the system to different solicitations.
Ilaria
Arrived in Caltech, after got to know the place well, I started working with the Ansys program. Since I have never worked with Ansys before, I’ve begun to sketch some examples to understand how the program works. So, I designed a few shapes with another software, Solid Works, I imported them to Ansys and I tried to make some simulations. In this first week I also read some paper about the Inverted Pendulum to understand its operation.
Chiara
I have worked in the machine shop to make aluminum supports for the three inverted pendula that are going to be pedestals of the system.
Maria Paola
My job is to design a wireless control of a stepping motor, through the use of a laser diode (whose output will be modulated with pulses) and a photodiode. The produced voltage will be increased using a transformer and rectified with a diode bridge. Finally, a capacitor and some switches will be needed to feed the stepping motor, whose steps can be controlled by the frequency of the input signal. I started working on transformers, and making an approximate calculation of how many coils are needed for the primary winding and the secondary one, knowing the input current and power, the permeability of the ferrite pot core to be used and the turns ratio I want to obtain. I have ordered and received the laser module and the silicon detectors right yesterday: during the week I began to build a transformer (with roughly the numbers of coils I found from my calculations) and to test it using a simple led and photodiode, with pulse signals. The gain I obtained was about 15 without any load.
Francesca
The acquisition card was not blasted; the signal was too noisy because the acquisition scan/rate of the program was too low. So, in order to amplify the scan/rate, I modified the lab view program (deleting everything that was wasting memory [as graphics]), in order to speed up the scan/rate maintaining the real time acquisition. I added an RC filter between the output of lab view and the input of the amplifier. I controlled that the dephasing added to the wave by the RC filter was negligible (at 100 Hz the dephasing was about 48 degree, at 10 Hz the dephasing was about 3 degree and since I have to work at 1 Hz, I considered this dephasing acceptable). I completed today the assembling of my test.
Anamaria and David:
We're almost done with the setup for our experiment. We will move it into a very quiet room. We've been dealing with little things that come up such as random connecting pieces, etc. The data acquisition has been setup from before so that part should not take long. We however need to setup the excitation at the same time of the four materials.
Riccardo.
Working on the bid request for the HAM SAS fabrication.
Valerio
Hacked up a first (very coarse) model of the HAM SAS.
For additional information about this report, contact Stan Whitcomb or Phil Lindquist