Weekly Report for Week Ending May 29, 2003


 Exec. Comm. Agenda
Highlights
LSC
Administration
Hanford Observatory
Livingston Observatory
MIT
Caltech
Detector
40 Meter
TNI
LASTI
Data Analysis
Adv. LIGO Development
Past Weekly Reports

The LIGO Executive Committee Agenda for Monday  June 2, 2003 will be:

  (Meeting time: 10:30 am Pacific Time)

Open meeting 10:30 - 11:30

Announcements
LSC Issues (Weiss)
Comments on Weekly Report
WBS 1 LIGO I Construction (Lindquist) WBS 2 LIGO Lab Operations WBS 3 and 4  Advanced R&D and LIGO II (Shoemaker)
CHANGE CONTROL BOARD/TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD SESSION AS NEEDED


Special Announcements:


Weekly Report Highlights
 


LSC Issues (Saulson)


Minutes of LSC Executive Committee telecon 23 May 2003, 0800 PDT
(Attending: Bruce Allen, Barry Barish, Sam Finn, Albert Lazzarini, Irena Petrac, Dave Reitze, Keith Riles, Gary Sanders, Peter Saulson, David Shoemaker, Daniel Sigg, Ken Strain, Rai Weiss, Benno Willke, Stan Whitcomb)

1. Status of LSC author list
Irena Petrac announced that the full LIGO I author list will be compiled in LaTeX format Tuesday of next week. Tom Frey and Albert Lazzarini are in charge of that conversion.

Peter Saulson will give it a first look. Once that is done, it will be posted on the Web. A message will be sent to LSC PI's, who will be instructed both to check the list themselves, but also to inform their group to look at it to check for errors or omissions. A message will be sent also to the whole LSC
email list, asking them to make sure the PI sends them the pointer to the list. In addition, all "old-timers" need to receive an email pointer to the list.  Irena Petrac will coordinate construction of the old-timers email list.

Stan Whitcomb pointed out that the latest version of the lsc alias has both errors and gaps. He will send "bounce" information to Irena, and his info about gaps. Peter will look into ways of checking for missing names.

Sam Finn proposed that this might be a big enough job to involve a membership secretary or committee. This is an idea that deserves serious consideration.

2. Plans for Hannover LSC meeting
Benno Willke presented the plans for the mechanics of the August Lsc meeting, to be held in Hannover. Details have been worked out for meeting space, hotel rooms, meals, GEO 600 tour, and the conference fee. All thought that the plan sounded very good.

Benno said that the web site announcing the meeting would probably be ready to post next week.

Barry Barish asked whether any plans for outreach or public meetings had been included in the plans. David Shoemaker asked specifically about possibly inviting funders. Benno promised to discuss these issues with his fellow hosts, and to report back later.

3. Status of S1 paper

The Stochastic Background paper has now been released to the LSC for a final reading. The one week comment period ends Monday 26 May. The Pulsar group's paper is essentially ready -- it is being held until Tuesday 27 May to allow the group to consider the latest timing issue, but however that is resolved the paper should be ready to release. The Inspiral paper is also essentially ready, but timing issues are getting consideration right now. The Burst Group has intensively critiqued its latest draft,and is waiting to see how the corrections look before deciding whether it is ready to release.

For Executive Committee approval, it will be necessary to carry out the following steps. Firstly, the Exec Comm needs to receive a single statement from a paper's Review Committee, stating that in its opinion the paper is sound and ready to publish. The Spokesperson is to contact the Reviewers, asking them to cast their review as they would if they were journal reviewers: is the paper correct, interesting, novel, etc. The Spokesperson will also collect from each Executive Committee member a written statement (which need not be extensive), stating his/her opinion about the paper. A concatenated collection of all of these materials will be sent to Exec Comm members in advance of our next meeting.  Whatever papers are ready to discuss for approval will form the main agenda items of our next meeting. Given the difficulty of scheduling ad hoc meetings, we will only plan on reviewing papers at regular monthly meetings.

There was a general consensus that the S1 instrument paper draft was excellent, and deserving of publication in a refereed archival journal.  Stan and David, the principal authors, noted that it would take some extra work to get it into publishable shape, but agreed to take on the work. It isn't clear whether to publish in RSI or NIM. The principal authors will have the primary say in the choice of journal.

4. Two highlights of UL Chairs face-to-face meeting 1 May 2003

LSC Newsletter:

One important idea was the creation of an LSC newsletter. Its function would be to ensure that LSC members are better informed about various LSC
activities.  There needs to be better communication about both "technical" work and about data analysis. A weekly or biweekly email would contain brief statements about recent activities, and include pointers to more extensive discussions.

To keep the workload manageable, the basic idea would be for individual Working Group chairs or Search Group co-chairs to send the editor(s) the summary and pointer, whenever they have something to report (e.g. meeting minutes or other progress.) The editor(s) will collate submissions on a weekly (or biweekly) basis, and send the summary email to the LSC membership.

Patrick Brady has volunteered to edit the portion of the newsletter concerning analysis work. David Shoemaker expressed interest in helping with the technical side, as did Sam Finn.

A few important issues were raised, that we will need to address. We need to think about how to communicate important matters about data analysis freely to all members of the LIGO-I collaboration, while keeping confidential that which should be confidential. Use of password-protected links was discussed, but even there careful editorial work is needed. We also probably need to ensure that the newsletter and its links are archived; thus, pointers shouldn't go to the wide assortment of websites now used for informal communication within the LSC.

Gary Sanders offered to make adjustments to the LIGO Lab weekly to make it dovetail with the LSC newsletter. Once the shape of the LSC newsletter is a little clearer, we will take up that offer.  

Additional LSC meeting(s):

The UL Chairs proposed the addition of two LSC meetings to the current annual schedule of two, making four in all per year. The idea was that these additional two would be "mini" LSC meetings, devoted primarily to discussion of data analysis issues, and in particular to serve as forums for discussing new results.

Barry expressed a reservation that restricting the agenda would discourage instrumentalists from attending, who would then be disenfranchised from the process of discussing analysis results. Sam agreed that the restricted agenda was not a good idea.

The Executive Committee settled on the idea of adding a third full LSC meeting to the annual calendar. In principle, they should be roughly equally spaced throughout the year, but the detailed calendar needs to be worked out.  The first additional meeting will be held in late October or early November at LHO (assuming they agree to host it.)

5. Upcoming meetings

There was nothing controversial about the idea of sending representatives to the Phystat 2003 meeting. The Executive Committee also endorsed participation in the proposed Special Session on Gravity Wave Phenomenology at the Jan 2004 AAS meeting. David urged that the abstracts be written carefully, so that there is no question of promising  to present results that might not be available in time.

6. MOU with the USC/ISI group

Albert Lazzarini said he had gotten comments on the revised draft of the MOU with the USC Information Sciences Institute, and asked that any more comments be sent to him promptly.

7. A brief report was given on the recent face-to-face meeting of the LSC Computing Committee. Both Albert and Sam described it as extremely productive.  A particular highlight was the agreement to include the Tier 2 centers in weekly telecons with the Lab, to allow for better coordination. For further information on the outcome of the meeting, the minutes can be found at http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~lazz/LSC_Computing/minutes20030514v2.pdf

The meeting adjourned at 0929 PDT.


LIGO I Construction/LIGO Laboratory Administration (Lindquist)


LIGO Weekly Site Telecon (Lindquist)

There was a site teleconference held on Thursday, May 29, 2003.  There will be no site teleconferences on June 5 or June 12 due to PAC meeting and Advanced LIGO Review respectively.  The following items were discussed on May 29:

Action 58 (Convenience Checks for Hanford, Livingston to follow)--the system seems to be working at Hanford.

Action 103 (Posters for Weber Bar Display)--Ed Jasnow and I will meet with Fred Raab while he is here for the Advanced LIGO Review.

Action 117 (Software to remove potentially sensitive data from excised computers)--software has been acquired and is being used. Action is closed.

Action 119 (Flow Charts for Petty Cash Tracking)--no longer relevant since the convenience checks are being implemented (Action 58), but it was deemed a good idea to review how we are doing relative to the auditor's recommendations.  It was noted that we should check to see if a flag is required on the P-Card reconciliation form to identify services that are not on contract that would require Caltech to issue 1099 forms.

Status of construction funds--currently over-encumbered by $255K.  We will meet next week (after May costs are in) to review strategy.

Status of Operating Funds--We will spend over $2.5 million this month.  Since all construction spending will cease next month, there will be a slight increment in monthly expenditures.  Also, there is a $3 million change request for EPI.  Current projections, therefore, are between $31 million and $34 million this year.

The list of current actions revised to reflect the status of open actions assigned through May 29, 2003 may be found at ACTION LIST.


PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (Chargois)

From: Ed Chargois <chargois_e@ligo.caltech.edu>


DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (Turner, Mak)

>From: Linda Turner - turner@ligo.caltech.edu>

Web pages for the DCC give simple how-to's for document numbering, easy access to the latest on-line documents, and search capabilities for the DCC database. Take a look. . .

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

> From: Cleveland Mak <mak_c@ligo.caltech.edu>

ACTIVITY

DCC Activity

WE 05/29/03 Packages Faxes
In 14 22
Out 8 38

Press here to access the DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER WEB PAGE.

COST SCHEDULE CONTROL SYSTEMS (Cunningham, Brambila, Kaufman, Salone)

From: Esther Cunningham <esther@ligo.caltech.edu>

Press here for ACCOUNTS PAYABLE HISTORY DATA .

From: "Brambila, Ruth" <Ruth.Brambila@caltech.edu>

From: Gina Salone <gsalone@ligo.caltech.edu> From: Florence Kaufman <fkaufman@ligo.caltech.edu>

SUBCONTRACTS MANAGEMENT (Petrac, Jasnow)

From: irena@ligo.caltech.edu (Irena Petrac)

From: Ed Jasnow <jasnow@ligo.caltech.edu>

CONSTRUCTION:

OPERATIONS:


SUPPORT (Baldon, Lloyd, Tischler)

>Irene Baldon

>Dorothy Lloyd >From: Ryan Tischler <rtischle@ligo.caltech.edu>

Advanced LIGO (Frey)

From: Thomas Frey <tfrey@ligo.caltech.edu>

Weekly Advanced LIGO Project Controls meeting was not held this week.

For list of documents that are being used to develop Adv. LIGO Cost and Schedule, see http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~tfrey/Cost_MTG_082002/

Advanced LIGO MRE Proposal (Highest Priority)

Project Plan for the 40-Meter Lab Upgrade continues.

Project Plan for the TNI Lab Project continues.

Continue to update the LASTI Schedule and incorporate any changes.

Cost Book Tool.

Development of the Advanced LIGO Project Controls Guidebook continues.

Project Web Site for posting schedule and progress related data continues to be updated with the latest and greatest.



Reports (Lindquist)

The Construction project quarterly report for the end of February was scheduled to be submitted at the end of March.  Irena has been working on this, but has been distrtacted by a number of other priority issues: LSC, contract activities for seismic isolation, optics coatings, etc.  We have discussed priorities, and the quarterly report is still slipping.

DCAA Audit Report Response: Comments have been provided to Caltech Administration, and Caltech Administration has prepared a response.



Change Control/Contingency (Lindquist)

The following change requests are pending or new.  Dennis Coyne submitted CR-030011 for the addition of an External Pre-Isolation (EPI) stage to the seismic isolation systems on the LIGO Livingston Observatories. This change is to improve the low frequency isolation of the currently installed seismic isolation systems as a retrofit with little or no disturbance to the alignment of the optics and without entry to the vacuum system.  I will put these change requests on the agenda for the next meeting of the Executuve Committee.

CR-030008 Furniture for the auditorium lobby, interaction area underneath the skylight atrium in the OSB, and on the second floor interaction area of the new laboratory/office building. (ON HOLD pending additional cost data.) M. Coles April 29, 2003
CR-030011 Seismic External Pre-Isolation at LIGO Livingston Observatory D. Coyne May 16, 2003


Human Resources (Akutagawa)

From: Cindy Akutagawa <cindy@ligo.caltech.edu>


Quality/Safety (Tyler)

>From: Bill Tyler <tyler@ligo.caltech.edu>

LIGO Hanford Observatory (LHO) and Interferometer Operations (Raab)


Most of the LHO crew has been involved in one way or another with preparations for the vent scheduled to begin Monday morning and expected to require keeping the gate valves to the beam tubes closed for several weeks thereafter.  Planned tasks include replacing ITMx  in H2 and moving the both ITMs in H1 by 28 mm to correct the Michelson asymmetry.  The DougC and BetsyB's detailed vent plan can be found at http://apex.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~dcook/2K%20ITMx%20REPLACEMENT%20VENT%20PLAN.pdf.

Both interferometers were locking reasonably well (at times) so progress was made on a number of commissioning-related activities.

Interferometer Commissioning

AkiteruT et al. continued acoustic noise investigations on the H1 AS port table (details here:  http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/22/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:22:12:44:04-akiteru).

PaulS and LucaM continued to make progress with the H1 wavefront sensing system.  They were able to get all ten degrees of freedom under control for the first time (details here: 
http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/23/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:24:01:48:52-paul).
Enabling the control of the differential ITM degree of freedom resulted in about a factor of two reduction in the pk-pk excursion of the AS_I signal For details see:
http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/25/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:25:13:08:43-peterF.

DickG continued his investigations of the cause of the AS port beam >ellipticity and eliminated a couple of possible causes--details here:
http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/25/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:26:13:46:35-gustafso
and here:
http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/27/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:27:18:43:53-gustafso.

NergisM, PeterF, and DanielS investigated PRM thermal effects by locking H1 at higher laser input power levels--details here:
http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/26/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:26:16:31:27-peterF.
then measuring cool-down curves in PRM  lock.  They concluded that the power buildups maximize at about 2.5 watts of laser power, well below the specified 6 W level--details here:
http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/27/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:27:03:00:39-daniel.

With the increase in the laser power, there were also efforts to understand the sideband recycling gain--details here:
http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/27/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:28:11:07:19-nergis
and other optical gains--details here: 
http://blue.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/ilog.cgi?group=detector&date_to_view=05/27/2003&anchor_to_scroll_to=2003:05:28:12:27:16-peterF.

Several mysteries remain unsolved.

NergisM and PeterF changed the optical configuration on the H1 AS port table.  They eliminated the EO shutter from the AS path and replaced the telescope on the AS periscope with a single lens.  Several optical path lengths have changed so efforts are underway to re-measure demodulation phases, etc.


LIGO Livingston Observatory (LLO) and Interferometer Operations (Coles)


(Valera)

Interferometer commissioning:
Work continues on the laser intensity stabilization servo. It is not yet fully operational. The new temperature stabilization control box with high gain was installed and tested. It caused the MINCO controller to rail out and so the old setup was reinstalled for now. The noise performance observed during S2 has been achieved again after careful alignment by Mike Fyffe. See http://www.ligo-la.caltech.edu/ilog/pub/groups/detector/logs/2003/images/05/28/mfyffe-1054111849.pdf   There was concern that we might have backstepped in some way as a consequence of the commissioning work undertaken in recent weeks, so this is reassuring. Ground noise is VERY high during the day at present due to the all of the construction activity on-site. The foundation work for the storage building, the entry gate and traffic control island, the installation of an improved ground, and excavation of a French drain by the front entrance have all contributed to the awful seismic environment. This very noisy work should conclude within a couple of weeks.

I continued working on the intensity noise of the light going into ifo. Rupal and I checked the effect of beam centering on the ISS PD on the intesity noise of the beam after the MC. I also looked at the effect of the ISS gain on the full ifo noise.  

(Rupal Amin)
(Ash) (Chethan)

CDS: Fixed a the dvd backup script for bugs. Working on updating the auto reboot logger. Added automatic logging for vacuum system changes. Backed up /cvs directory on tape after moving the tape to the control room. Tested lilnux dataviewer both Grace and XMGR version.

(Shannon Roddy)

GC: Finished up a security audit with Larry last week. There are some loose ends that I need to tie up on several machines, but for the most part the audit went OK. Looking into a backup system for GC. The system I am looking at would allow me to give backup capability to pretty much any machine on site. The software is also extremely multiplatform. It will backup anything from Solaris, Windows, Linux, and even others like Novell, AIX, Mac, etc. The cost seems very reasonable as compared to tape backups. Preparing for a trip to the Usenix technical conference from June 8th to the 14th. I will be attending tutorials on LDAP directories, Samba 2.2 and 3.0, and advance DNS administration. Bonnie's machine crashed on Tuesday. She has unfortunately lost all of her email since it was only stored on her machine. All of her other files and data should be OK though. I initially thought that she had a virus, but it turns out that her machine is clean from viruses and that it was Windows just being Windows. After about two years of cruft builds up, this can be expected to happen. I am rebuilding her machine and reinstalling her software. This process usually takes at least 1-2 days since she has lots of it. I had Marcell return his computer to ASA. This machine has been back once already. When it came back I worked with it and did a fresh install of the OS. The machine behaves fine for a while, but once it warms up it locks up after about 3 minutes of use. I suspect it is either a heat problem or a power supply issue. I tried running it on a ombination of different hardware and none seemed to fix the problem. The only thing I was unable to swap was the power supply due to lack of a spare ATX supply with a high enough wattage. Worked with LSU a little this week. Seems that one of the T1s is having some problems. Rick Simmons came out here to inspect our end and it seems that it may be a Bell South issue. Thinking about what my requirements will be for a computer to put in the auditorium. I plan to order it in the next week or so. Getting ready to reinstall the machine which serves as our dhcp server. This machine is also my workstation. Had Bonnie follow up on a quote from Sun on a 280R to replace my web server. She will have to order it since it is above my Pcard limit. Once the web server is upgraded I will begin offering a web mail

(Igor Yakushin)

LDAS admin:
LDAS data analysis:


Detector/Technical Support (Coyne)


 see also the Revision Technical Review Board (RTRB) status here

Seismic Upgrade Project

see also the LASTI report

A decision on whether to proceed with HEPI or MEPI is still pending.  Jonathan Kern and Ken Mason are getting quotes on production parts.

Ken Mailand

DMT

John Zweizig

This week I wrote a program to infer the As Photodiode signal from the AS_Q and AS_I signals to make it possible to look for saturation of the PD ADC during S2. I am now running this on the L1 data. Many data segments have been flagged so far. The vast majority are cases where the saturation occurred just at the end of a lock and are likely a side effect of the lock loss (or visa versa). There are however, several cases where the saturation occurred in the middle of the science mode segment. These will be flagged for the benefit of the analysis groups.

CDS

see also 5/28 weekly CDS meeting minutes in the commissioning archives:

CDS Software

no report

CDS Hardware

Rich Abbott reporting

Jay Heefner reporting

EMI Retrofit

PSL

PeterKing

I measured the relative intensity noise of an NPRO laser out to 2 MHz to see if the ~500 kHz noise present on the site 10-W lasers was present.  No large signal was observed.  Although there was a large peak at 13 Hz that I did not see previously.  Next go around I will check the output of a 10-W laser.

Errant Beam Blocks

Mike Smith, Ken Mailand

All baffle parts and tooling are cleaned and baked, and on the way to LHO and will arrive Thursday 5-29.

Optics Analysis

Erika D’Ambrosio

After last visit in Hanford by Bill who measured a power gain very close to the one predicted by my simulations when the arms are unlocked, we kept on preparing the draft on sideband imbalance and studying some possible explanations for the thermal lensing effect. For example one possibility is that the curvature of one of the mirrors does not coincide with its nominal value. The numbers we have are due to measurements made in Australia as far as I understood. The reflectivities are also due to different measurements and there is a 10% disagreement. Also the last cool down curve that has been measured by Daniel et al. is somehow strange.

Unfortunately I can only use the starting and the ending value of the cool down curves and the latter is used for scaling the former, so that basically there is only one number available.  The set of simulations I ran are characterized by one parameter, that is the lensing effect. I had not even split that in coating and bulk contribution and I had not split that in x and y arm.

However the two measurements I had previously taken into account were at least consistent: the two intercepts for the absorbed power are in the same ratio as the two input powers. Scaling the maximum gain by the asymptotic power in the last measurement gives a result that is not easy to understand unless more than 30mW are allowed to be absorbed into the mirrors. In this case we should be exploring the other side of the curve. However this would not agree with the model for thermal lensing which has been used for predicting maximum gain at 6W of input power. That model implied 15mW of power are absorbed in the bulk and 10mW in the coated surface of the mirrors when the system is at its working point.

Optical Contamination Cavities

Lee Cardenas, Liyuan Zhang

OTF Lab. (W. Bridge)
Contamination Cavity # 1
The test sample kAPTON (Polyimid paint) contamination test was completed. The ring down and beat frequency measurements taken everyday was completed and basically the test sample showed no contamination to the mirrors.  Total loss = 0.0 +/- 1.3 ppm/year, absorption loss = -0.2 +/- 0.2 ppm/year

We have now introduced into this cavity a new test sample a  10mm Capacitance position sensor, which consists of a sma cable and a ceramic connector at the end.  The whole cabling was introduced and the chamber is pumping down and cavity is locked and we are taking ring down and beat frequency every day.

Absorption Test Measurement prototype in progress
 The absorption measurements of a 5 inches diameter sapphire mirror was completed.  We got another 1.00" sapphire mirror which is  tested for absorption and it is in progress.  Absorption results will be released soon by Liyuan.  Liyuan will be meeting with vendors to acquire a high power laser for our absorption test bench.

Scatterometer system  is in STANDBY for measurements.  We will be updating our optical train by replacing new mirrors and lens and making a precise alignment to ensure measurement repetition more accurate without having to adjust the alignment to catch the reflected beam each time we replace a new mirror to be tested.

OTF Lab at Lauritsen ROOM 38

Cavity #3
As specified before, cavity with 50 ppm mirrors is hard to make it work.  After all the efforts to improve it, all we got was a power of only ~90 mw and its visibility ~70%.

We opened the chamber again and replaced it with a cavity with 70 ppm mirrors and hung with one end at 1.8 degree higher that the other end and pumped it down and made alignment, locked the cavity and we got 120 mw of power with a 95% ! visibility. BUT the output still small in order for us to use it.  We found out by Helena that these 70 ppm. mirrors was not fully cleaned as it should because the flat mirror has a small scratch almost on center.  We found two new sets of 70 ppm mirrors that Helena cleaned for us and we have replaced with these ones.   Now the cavity is locked with these new cleaned mirrors and the power obtained is 147 mw.  We are improving this cavity as time goes by and cavity gets more stable.

Cavity #2 Test cavity STILL in STANDBY waiting on silver plated screws to be replaced.  Optical train upgrading is in progress.


40 Meter Interferometer (Weinstein)


May 30, 2003

Suspended mass mode cleaner (Ugolini, Miyakawa, Vass, Abbott): Core digital suspension controllers (DSC), LSC, ASC, and other Electronics (B. Abbott, Heefner, Bork, Taylor): Mode Cleaner WFS system (Ourjoumtsev, Abbott, Eichenfield): Suspended optics: PSL and ISS (O. Miyakawa, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, F. Nocera, D. Ugolini, S. Vass, C. Mow-Lowry): Optical sensing (Smith, Ourjoumtsev, Goggin, Miyakawa): Facilities and vacuum envelope (Ugolini, Vass, Jones): South Annex Bake Ovens (Taylor):


Thermal Noise Interferometer (Libbrecht)


Previously we reported that we were looking for sources of phase loss above 100 kHz in the mode-cleaner servo, in preparation for improving our frequency stabilization at high frequencies. This week we identified the remaining sources of phase loss as a pole in the RF photodiode's response at 700 kHz, and an apparent 60 ns delay in the mixer.  We are now able to model the response of the Pockels cell path accurately in both magnitude and phase up to 30 MHz, well above our expected unity-gain-frequency.  We have now begun design on an amplifier, based on our current model of the system, that will implement the fast-frequency-correcting Pockels cell path up to a few hundred kiloHertz.


LASTI (Zucker)


LASTI (Adhikari, Allen, Coyne, Mason, MacInnis, Mittleman, Nayfeh, Ottaway, Rankin, Rollins, Shoemaker, Zucker, Zuo)

HEPI
We have been working on the hydraulic pumping system.  With the optical isolator from Rich Abbott installed in the pressure sensor signal path we have looked at the pressure spectra. Except for some high frequency signals, which are independent of the pump, the pressure noise meets the required noise specifications.

We are currently replacing both the pump and the motor with the new models supplied by Ken Mailand. Myron is developing a precision alignment procedure to reduce wear and vibration in the coupling (see the LASTI ilog for results).

MEPI
We are still working on the sensor correction coefficients.

We have developed a matlab model of the sensor correction using measured and modeled transfer functions to set the sensor correction coefficients and filter functions.

We are also using a measured time series from all of the sensors as a second approach.

PSL
Jamie continued characterization of his advanced intensity stabilizer and is writing up his results to date.

Rana further updated and characterized the frequency stabilizer electronics. 


Data Analysis and Computing (Lazzarini)


Simulation and Modeling (Bhawal)

E2E weekly Physics meeting

Luca described the lock acquisition problem recently faced in H1 and issues related to increased input power. Luca and Matt also discussed about Wavefront Sensor issues and how SimLIGO could be effectively used to look into the problems. Generation of noise curves from SimLIGO was also discussed. Attendees: Luca, Matt, Virginio, Hiro, Biplab.

New Optical Model

(Matt) This week I returned to the new optical model code.  My intent is to  do some final documentation and testing, then hand it over to Hiro for work  with the summation cavities and eventual incorporation into E2E.

Code development and maintenance 

(Hiro)
 Modeler support:
 Several example programs using e2e are posted in the e2e home page.
 (1) pendulum with locking servo
 (2) Simple FP (ETM moving longitudinally)
 (3) FP simulation using multi mode (ETM moving and rotating)

 Modeler code:
 Hiro and Melody worked together to investigate various compiler issues,  including

CVS and tarball distribution:
A meeting was held (Hiro, Ed, Bruce and Melody) to follow up the last week's meeting about the reorganization of CVS so that a leaner and cleaner tarball would be distributed. All obsolete components, including C++ based alfi (alfi4 and older), are "deleted" from CVS (still one can get codes if needed), and the tarball contains only the minimum needed.

(Melody)

(Ed Maros) Removed Alfi from CVS.

Alfi

(Bruce)

LIGO Data Analysis System

Software Systems (Blackburn)
We are now in a code freeze in preparation for the 0.7.0 release of LDAS. I would estimate this release to be between one and two weeks away. As of today, we have begun rerunning all system level tests. Only bug fixes that have been approved will be allowed into CVS for this release.

It was discovered this week that the DB2 version 8.1 that we have been evaluating for the next LDAS release (0.8.0) only supports a 90 day evaluation license, even though it was licensed under the Academic Scholastic Program at IBM. This was just reported to LDAS team leaders yesterday so working the problem to find the constraints has just begun.  In the worst case we could buy the licenses for roughly a thousand dollars per DB2 server.

The issue with using certain NDAS frames in LDAS continued this week. The confusion levels have only gone up since last week. We still do not know what in the NDAS frames the LDAS Frame I/O library is unhappy about. It appears that some NDAS frames point to illegal locations on the file system for locating particular data sets. But this issue is not seen in the framelib I/O libary from VIRGO. We have modified our FrVerify to report more details of the issue and are now modifying the FrDump code to report additional details to locate the problem. Note that some NDAS frames do not cause any issues in LDAS while others do.

The memory leaks in the metaDataAPI have now been fixed. However, the dataConditionAPI still has a one to two kilobyte leak per job. There has been some isolation of the memory leak to certain types of jobs, but no progress in identifying the place in the code that causes the leaks. Use of memory leak detection tools such as valgrind and insure++ on standalone codes based on the same code base have not pinpointed the problems either.

New code from Penn State for Kalman filtering was checked into CVS this week. Eric Rotthof (the author) has made many fixes and brought the code up to date for the new GCC compiler.

We have begun testing LDAS against the newest GCC compiler (3.3). This compiler will be the foundation for the 0.8.0 release of LDAS but not for the 0.7.0 release which uses 3.2.3. LDAS has been shown to work with only one issue under Redhat 9 with this compiler. The issue is with the new DB2 8.1 developers library and our interface in the metaDataAPI to that version of the library. Looks like we will need to modify out dbEasy library (ODBC interface library) to work properly with DB2 8.1. We are now beginning to evaluation this compiler under solaris.

Hardware Systems (Anderson)

Caltech
(Dan Kozak)

(Al Wilson)

(Stuart Anderson)

Livingston
(Igor Yakushin)

Hanford
(Greg Mendell)

(Ben Johnson)

Data Analysis Activities (Lazzarini)

K. Reilly:
Most of my time now is being spent learning how the stochastic DSO works.  This is my first introduction to LAL an LALWrapper so it is taking some  time.  I have also re-started going through the GW phyics notes and looking up the references explaining the theory behind the stochastic data analysis. I have begun preparing for next week's talk.

Mendell:

Yakushin:

Weinstein:

Creighton:
Finished writing and testing LAL routines for double-precision time-domain filtering of single-precision data.  These routines reduce truncation errors, and also (surprisingly) execute 20% to 30% faster than the existing single-precision time-domain filtering routines.

Lazzarini:
Completed a new analysis for the stochastic group. This is motivated by the inspiral group's "chi2" analysis on the consistency of a signal's spectral content with the expect model signal. It is the f-domain analog of the time-shift chi2 analysis I conducted for large amplitude injections. The analysis uses the run-averaged cross-correlation statistic spectrum and related optimal filter spectrum. Results are in nice concordance with the optimal filtering results -- the so-called "point estimates". However, for the H-1H2 pair this provides a way of quantizing the degree to which the observed negative correlation is inconsistent with astrophysical process (let alone the sign of the effect!).

General Computing (Wallace)

Livingston:
(Shannon)

Hanford:
(Christine)

CIT:
(Mike)

(Lisa)

(Veronica)

(Larry)


Advanced LIGO Development (Shoemaker)


Advanced LIGO and supporting R&D

Seismic Isolation

No report

Suspension

From: Janeen Romie <romie_j@ligo.caltech.edu>

AdLIGO Suspensions
Six hybrid osems are with Bob Taylor being assembled. He hopes to get them completed this afternoon with Helena's help. Helena and Calum will assemble them aand Mark will set up the electronics for the mode cleaner.
Preparing for the NSF review.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--><!--[endif]-->

From: ctorrie <ctorrie@ligo.caltech.edu>
 
1) QUAD Layout for the ETM

a) Eddy Current Damper (ECD)

b) Upper Mass

2) Cantilever Blades

3) MATLAB model

Norna and I have been working on creating a help file, a schematic explaining the parameters and including revision control oin the quad input file. It is hoped that a new set of files with the 2001 MIT quad parameters can be sent to MIT later this week.

4) MC Suspension (OSEMS)

6 Anodised Aluminium osems have arrived safely from the U. of Glasgow. These have been tested, assembled with LED's, PD's and pigtails. On Thursday morning Helena and I will install these in the suspension and then start damping tests with Mark Barton.  Twenty new lightweight, one piece, coil clamps have also arrived from the U. of Glasgow.

Pre-stabilized Laser

From: Peter King <pking@ligo.caltech.edu>

I am in the midst of preparing material for the up-coming NSF Review.

Input Optics

No report.

Core Optics

From: Helena Armandula <ahelena@ligo.caltech.edu>

Sodium Silicate Bonding, SF4 / Silica Bonds:

Auxiliary Optics

From: Michael Smith <smith@ligo.caltech.edu>
 
Working on designing an R&D experiment for a SURF student this summer to study photon-force induced movement of a locked cavity mirror. The 40m mode cleaner cavity curved mirror will be pushed with an external photon beam and the loop response will be measured. It may be possible to actively control the mirror position with the photon beam within a narrow frequency band.

Interferometer Sensing and Controls

No report

Data Acquisition, Diagnostics, Network & Supervisory Control

No report

Other Laboratory R&D

TNI (Sander Liu):

Working on the preliminary circuit board design for the TNI boost amplifier. Shipped ten 850 Hz filter modules to LHO.

From: Youichi Aso<aso@granite.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
 
Eric

Melted a series of new candidates, one looks like another step forward towards a glass.  Am having problems with explosion while melting due to thermal stresses and seeminly brittle casts, beleive this is due to high Si concentration, will lower this and see what happens.

Greg Allyson

I am currently comparing the UCLA vicker hardness results to the Caltech ones. The UCLA ones seem to be more consistant. I am planning to finish the indentations using the UCLA machine next week. 

Enrico Youichi


For additional information about this report, contact sanders@ligo.caltech.edu