|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The LIGO Executive Committee Agenda for Monday May 7, 2001 will be:
(Meeting time: 10:30 am Pacific Time)
Open meeting 10:30 - 11:30
Special Items: NSF Review reprise, collaboration with Virgo on coatings and R&D, collaboration with ACIGA on the 80 meter facility at Gingin
no report
WBS 1.2 LIGO Operations--Administration
A site teleconference was held on Thursday, May 03, 2001. Discussion included:
From: Ed Chargois <chargois_e@ligo.caltech.edu>
>From: Linda Turner - turner@ligo.caltech.edu>
Web pages for the DCC give simple how-to's for document numbering, easy access to the latest on-line documents, and search capabilities for the DCC database. Take a look. . .
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
| Packages | Faxes | |
| In | 42 | 35 |
| Out | 18 | 31 |
Press here to access the DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER WEB PAGE.
From: Esther Cunningham <esther@ligo.caltech.edu>
Press here for ACCOUNTS PAYABLE HISTORY DATA.
From: "Brambila, Ruth" <Ruth.Brambila@caltech.edu>
From: irena@ligo.caltech.edu (Irena Petrac)
Support (Wood)
On vacation.
Dorothy Lloyd
Progress Period from 04.27 to 05.03
Accomplishments:
WBS 1.4.1.2 Project Controls (LIGO Construction)
We have established a partial schedule for the review of MRE cost estimates for selected systems over the next two months.
Still working with David Shoemaker to set up assignments for Advanced R&D Annual Report. We should be submitting this report (necessary to get FY 2001 Advanced R&D funding) over the next month or so.
The following Change Requests have
been submitted:
| CR-000018 | WBS 1.1.4 | Curbing for Service Roads at Livingston | G. Stapfer |
| CR-000019 | WBS 1.2 | Additional Lab Equipment | D. Coyne |
| CR-000020 | WBS 1.1.4 | Staging Building and Renovations to Existing Building--Livigston | F. Asiri |
| CR-010001 | WBS 1.1.4 | Return of Unused Construction Budget to Contingency for Civil Construction | F. Asiri |
| CR-010002 | WBS 1.2.1.1.6-7 | Return of Unused Construction Budget to Contingency for ISC Design | S. Whitcomb |
| CR-010003 | WBS 1.2.1.1.9 | Return of Unused Construction Budget to Contingency for Detector Systems Engineering | S. Whitcomb |
| CR-010004 | WBS 1.2.3.1 | Return of Unused Construction Budget to Contingency for Physics Environment Monitoring | S. Whitcpomb |
I have distributed copies of these Change Requests and scheduled a Change Control Board Tuesday, May 8, 2001 at 9am PDT.
Note also that we have scheduled a Technical Review Board (TRB) on May 18th at 10:00am PDT to discuss design and placement aspects of the OSB II building at Hanford.
Press for the latest Contingency Needs Projection.
From: Kris Duncan <kris@ligo.caltech.edu>
From: Ed Jasnow <jasnow@ligo.caltech.edu>
no report
OPTICS: (J. Kern) Cleaning and housekeeping in the LVEA and VEAs continues, in preparation for the vent which will follow E-4. We discovered a problem in the clean room over HAM 1; some of the fans made an loud noise when first powered and this is being investigated (thanks to Peter Saulson's sharp ears). The optics labs have had a thorough reorganization, and are ready for processing optics.
Control Room: (R. Riesen) Operators are continuing with tasks needed
for the upcoming vent. Clean rooms have been placed over Ham1, Hams
2&3, BSC3, Ham 5 in the LVEA. The Y-end clean room is in place
and the X-end clean room has yet to be positioned Dust monitors are
now in place in clean rooms and operational in the LVEA. Operator
training is continuing and special training is
underway for control room operations support for the E-4.
Input Optics: (S. Yoshida) Investigated if a Shack-Hartman wave front
detector can be used to measure the wavefront of the input beam to the
arms. If it is usable, it is possible to characterize the input beam at
various location, and thereby possible to evaluate the mode matching to
the arm resonators. The
Shack-Hartman wavefront detector we have is designed for 633 nm (He
Ne
laser wavelength). So the question is whether or not it can be used
for 1.06 micron (YAG wavelength). Tested the Shack-Hartman using the PSL
beam
on the PSL table where the beam is well characterized. The measured
radius
of curvature agreed with the expected value with +/-10%.
Found RF leakage at various locations in LVEA (24 MHz and 33 MHz, at
least). Photo detector (New focus 1811) on IOT table picks up the RF,
making impossible to evaluate the RFAM. We are looking into the source
of
the leakage.
|
|
|
|
Installation&
Commissioning:
Livingston |
Other
Science/Engineering Activities:
Issues/Concerns |
·The pitch angle for the ITMy,2k optic was found to be too far off after the vacuum bake. The guide rod and wire standoff have been removed and the optic will be re-hung and re-baked. We expect to install the ITM early next week. This is about a 1 week delay.
·A visual inspection of the 2k BS magnet/standoffs after the earthquake didn’t reveal any problems. The 2k BS OSEMs were removed recently and a pull test took one side magnet/standoff off (probably a consequence of the earthquake). We have decided to switch the OSEM to the other side and leave this optic without one side magnet. The resulting magnetic dipole moment imbalance may need to be corrected in the future, but does not warrant further delay to the commissioning.
·The 2k vertex re-alignment has begun; the x beam manifold has been vented and a spool piece near the cryo pump will be pulled in preparation for the first theodolite/autocollimator setup. If all goes well, we may finish by 5/14.
The Q of the internal modes of the ITM and ETM have been measured
with
one of the masses exhibiting a butterfly lowest frequency
mode Q under
10000.
An attempt was made to lock
the power recycled recombined Fabry-Perot
Michelson. The system did not
lock but there were moments when both
cavities were in resonance and
a power buildup over a single cavity
resonance of 15 was measured.
The computer world in Livingston
is currently tenuous. It took a goodly
fraction of a week to recover
from CDS computer disk crash that was
experienced last week. Furthermore,
the site has had computer break-ins
into the web server, the file
server, Decatur and Delaronde since the
beginning of April. We will
need to take measures that reduce the risk but
still allow us to use computers in a reasonably facile way
first and the second time the end station. The ratio
between these values
can in principle tell us the mode mismatch and we
can calculate the
necessary changes in the position of MMT2. I tried
to measure the beam
sizes by using a camera image of the spot on the suspension
structure in
the end station. This picture was grabbed with a frame
grabber and followed
by an analysis with the software from Spiricon should
in principle tell us
at least the ratio. Unfortunately, these measurements
are much more
difficult and much less
accurate than is necessary. In this case, the intensity
was very low, but
as I will show you later, even with sufficient intensity,
the results are
"funny".
Nevertheless, from the simple TV screen, we estimated
that the ratio
between the two spots is around 1.5+/-0.2, in agreement
with an earlier
measurement done by Joe Giamie and Mike Zucker (see
ilog 01/03). They
measured for the first spot 68mm +/- 17mm and for
the second spot 108mm +/-
22mm, for a ratio of 1.59. We later confirmed that
the ratio and the size
of the beams in both arms look at least very similar.
A look into the calculation of the mode matching reveals
that there is a
maximum in the ratio of the two spots. If the distance
between MMT2 and
MMT3 is 44 mm to long, the ratio would be 1.567. A
smaller and also a
larger deviation will again reduce that ratio.
Rana was able to lock one of the arm cavities on the
Bullseye mode (see
ilog 03/17). The transmitted intensity was monitored
and compared to the
transmitted intensity of the 00 mode. The result was
T_BE/T_00 = 6.45% +/- 0.7%. The error bars come
directly from the
intensity measurement and does not include any possible
systematic errors.
Possible systematic errors (tilt) would pump some
power into the 10-mode,
but that would reduce the power in both symmetric
modes and Rana said that
no tilt was visible, probably ruling out a large influence
of tilt.
In any case, if we believe this ratio, we have to
reduce the distance
between MMT2 and MMT3 by 2.25 cm +/- 0.15 cm. That
should theoretically
bring the mode matching to 99.9%. The adjustment should
probably be made to
the high site of this value, e.g., 2.31 cm shorter,
because that fits much
better into the spot size ratio (although 2.25 cm
is not to far off) and at
least from the models the mode matching gets even
better that 99.9%.
Finally, the beam sizes at the bright port was measured
when the beams were
reflected at the ITMx, ITMy and in a recombined Michelson
configuration (no
arm cavities involved in any of these measurements).
(See ilog 04/13 for
details.) ITMx: x-direction: 196 px (pixels), y-direction:
199 px. ITMy:
x-direction: 196 px, y-direction: 193 px. There was
good agreement between
the two arms in all directions, suggesting a nice
circular beam.
Now the recombined Michelson: x-direction: 253 px,
y-direction: 262 px a
difference of 25%! Why? Guido has two explanations:
"a) the radii of curvature of the two beams coming
from ITMx and ITMy are
different, just by chance, and not the beam sizes.
And they are different
by an amount I haven't been able to find with the
mode matching models,
that just explains the recombined Michelson shape.
I tried different
mismatches but couldn't find the numbers that would
support this
explanation, but that doesn't mean that it does not
exist. But still, that
is a very unique solution and I don't believe that
we are sitting on such a
unique solution.
b) the camera and the spiricon software just stinks.
We have about 4 times
more power on the camera in the recombined case compared
to the single
measurements. That's enough to screw up everything."
done some analysis to see how the seismometer signals
might be processed
in the microseismic feedforward system. The problem
here has been that the
seismometers give a good signal for the microseismic
peak, but at
frequencies below 0.1 Hz they show lots of fluctuations
which aren't
present in the long arm lengths; this needs to be
filtered out (or
avoided) without spoiling the microseismic prediction
signal. Robert took
some simultaneous data at the LHO Y end station with
a standard Guralp
seismometer and a Streckheisen STS-2 seismometer.
Summary of my findings:
1. At a time of low wind speed (~1 m/sec), the STS-2
signal can be
high-pass filtered in such a way as to limit its f<0.1
Hz noise to less
than ~0.5 micron pk, while preserving the phase at
the microseismic peak
enough to allow a 5x suppression (no more) of the
microseismic peak.
2. At a time of higher wind speed (~7 m/sec), there
is much more f<0.1 Hz
signal present in the STS-2 (& Guralp), which
does not correspond to actual
slab displacement (slab tilt is the current theory).
Thus the filtering
applied above would not be sufficient, and this added
wind (tilt?) noise
needs to be removed, or avoided, some other way.
3. The low-wind, f<0.1 Hz noise from the Guralp
is about 10x higher than
from the STS-2. Thus the filtering applied in #1 would
be insufficient;
the Guralps thus look to be useless for the microsiesmic
suppression
system.
components. All the RGA scans look good.
The person at Lightwave Electronics responsible for
evaluating whether or
not a laser is worth repairing, apparently got into
a fairly serious motor
cycle accident. Serious enough where no one
at Lightwave knows when she/he
will return. Consequently I don't know when
the two NPRO lasers that were
recently sent back will return. The 10-W laser
recently returned a few
weeks ago has not been looked at yet. I have
not been given an estimate
for that laser's return either.
The prototype intensity stabilization servo has been
tested down in the PSL
Lab. If I remember correctly, the in-the-loop
RIN was about
-155 dB/Sqrt[Hz] and the performance might be limited
by the modified
PDA-55 photodetector that we were using. More tests are underway.
Rick Karwoski, Ben Abbott, Paul Russell, Sander Liu
Intensity stabilization. .
We have closed the loop around the PMC light through our prototype
electronics. Thus far we have been able to achieve 155db RIN at the PMC
photo-detector point in the 100 Hz region. Our suspicions are that we have
reached the point where we are sitting on top of a combination diode
shot-noise + instrument noise floor. We spent today knocking down
the electronic noise floor.
We will resume closed-loop tests tomorrow with the objective of picking up another 10 db or so in the 100 Hz area. If successful we move on to the next step: We will simulate the Mode-Cleaner and include it in our tests.
PSL Custom Boards
Sander has finished testing one 80 MHz VCO (S/N BL2002) board. In the
process of repairing and testing the second one (S/N BL2003). The completed
boards will then be integrated with the power electronics, assembled and
tested at Lauritsen.
Photo-Detector issues An order for 50 C30642 units has been placed. The lead-time is nominally 4-6 weeks. We will be receiving bits and pieces of the order from the vendor.
optics suspensions. The parts that hold OSEMs will
be sent out for wire EDM
of the OSEM holes soon. We anticipate completion of
these suspensions in
about a month.
This week I worked to make the triggers more visible and more easily
controlled by the operators. To this end, I wrote
a couple pages of
documentation that will be available on the web, added
an automatically
generated web page listing the most recent 100 triggers,
and modified the
trigger manager status page to give more information
about the monitors
generating the triggers..
This week we focused on the Mode Cleaner lock. By reproducing the
setup of this summer, we were able to lock the laser to the Mode-Cleaner
but with a lower bandwidth (~40 kHz). The goal is to reach a unity
gain
frequency (UGF) of 80-100kHz so as to increase the gain and reach the
desired frequency stabilization of 30mHz/rHz @ 100 Hz.
Presently, the filtering for the control consists of a string of
pre-amplifiers and passive filters, acting on both the Mode-Cleaner
back
mirror and the laser's pzt actuator. It turns out that the pre-amplifiers
and the new laser that we are using add enough phase delay to prevent
us
from having a stable and robust lock with UGF greater than 50 kHz.
We
noticed that for each pre-amplifier that we added in the chain, we
would
add 20 deg of phase delay @ 100 kHz. Once we discovered this, we
eliminated all but one pre-amplifier and we were able to push the UGF
up
to ~70 kHz with a phase margin of ~40 deg.
With the present setup, we have an effective gain Geff (defined as
Geff=Gpzt/(1+Gmc), where Gpzt is the overall transfer function of the
pzt
path and Gmc is the one for the Mode Cleaner path) of
Geff=600 @ 100 Hz
Geff=80 @ 1 kHz
which should reduce the measured free-running laser frequency noise
to
dnu_res = 60 Hz/rHz / 600 = 100 mHz/rHz @ 100 Hz
dnu_res = 10 Hz/rHz / 80 = 125 mHz/rHz @ 1 kHz
a factor of 3 above the requirement (T000077). The presence of 2 boosts,
integrating up to 10 kHz, will guarantee the control's performance
to
spec.
The next 2 steps consist of shifting the crossover frequency to a lower
frequency (presently it is at ~40Hz) and modify our NIM module to
reproduce the present control setup.
LASTI (MacInnis, LaLiberte, Miller, Mason, Rollins, Harry,
Mittleman, Shoemaker, Zucker)
-------------------------------------------
Cleanrooms: Cleanroom for HAM19 is complete and operational.
Custom
BSC cleanroom, catwalks and "cartridge installation" annex structures
were inspected by Ken Mason yesterday at the vendor and approved for
shipment; unfortunately the paint wasn't dry, so installation has been
delayed until Monday 5/7. We have hired professional riggers
to bring
the structure in and erect it; the construction is quite heavy since
it
must double as a person-rated work platform.
Seismic installation: The remaining HAM19 seismic supports were staged
for installation and a parts inventory completed. BSC fixtures were
cleaned and staged for upcoming support installation. We are overdue
for fine alignment of the BSC piers, plan to take this on next week
after the cleanroom is in.
Side experiments: To make way for the BSC cleanroom, the former "Stiff
Prototype" (active LIGO II seismic isolator) was moved away from the
BSC area on Hillman rollers. It will be dismantled next week
for
shipment to Stanford; a custom crate has been ordered to pack it in.
The empty chamber will then be reinstalled in a new location to accept
installation of the GEO quad pendulum prototype, scheduled to arrive
third week of June with Norna Robertson and Callum Torrie.
CDS/electronics: The completed SOS rack crossconnect and eurocard
modules arrived from LLO. We did a fit check of the relay racks
in the
lab and decided the previously agreed rack location (outside of right
arm) was not workable; it interfered with staging space for the quad
pendulum assembly and SEI/SUS cartridge installation. We're now
exploring the idea of breaking up the four racks into two bays on the
inside of the left arm. This would also give shorter runs for
the PSL
and IO electronics and simplifies the cable trays.
Vacuum system: We need to relocate our pumping and
instrumentation station 10 meters down the right arm to make more
clearance near the BSC. Tentative plan is to complete this before
the
BSC bellows leakcheck (sched. first week of June).
Simulation and Modeling (Bhawal)
Dual Recycling summation cavity
-------------------------------
(Hiro) Studied possibilities to simulate a dual recycling configurations
for the Advanced LIGO and 40m. For 40m, the best is to use primitive
modules, and for the Advanced LIGO, we need to develop a special module
(summation cavity of the dual recycling Michelson). The use of Power
Recycling module for the dual recycling configuration for either case
does not buy us anything.
Pre Stabilised Laser
--------------------
(Biplab) Did calculations on non-uniformities in photo-detector responses
and noise in PSL. Had discussions with Rick Savage.
Code development
----------------
(Andrea) Getting ready to include the Frame output in the e2e.
(Hiro) Low level coding of the simulation engine, including the symbolic
constant handling.
Alfi
----
(Ed Maros) Investigated why fully qualified paths sometimes appear
in
box files.
(Bruce) Continuing work on implementation of connection junctions.
Etc.
----
(Ed Maros) Interviewed three C++ programmer candidates
(Vicere') I have essentially completed a small C library based on
the Framelib to be used to easily generate frames from user code or
from
given files. It is written on the same lines of the frame builder
simulation contained in the Siesta code, and therefore can be
used also to produce frames from the e2e simulation.
It is written on top of the Framelib and not the framecpp
because I wanted something to be possibly used also in absence
of a C++ compiler, for instance to give MDC people a easy way
to produce frames at home.
It remains to be tested with data that Patrick Brady shall send
me at the end of this week.
LIGO Data Analysis System
Software Systems (Blackburn)
Most of the week was spent working on the dataPipeline command needed
to
support the next release of LDAS and needed to carry out most of the
next
MDC on May 15th. The dataPipeline is being tested in sections since
it
involves many steps in many APIs. The biggest success so far has been
the
successful sending of metadata generated in a LSC provided search code
to
the LDAS DB2 database. Also of significance is the ability of the data
conditioning to provide the correctly formatted data needed by the
search
codes.
There were several minor modifications to the database table designs
this
week. These were needed to support the MDC. There is a data column
for
statistical data which was discovered to need double precision reals
and
this is now supported.
The wrapperAPI is now being built using the LAM standard C++ exception
handling. This took quite a bit of debugging work do to a requirement
that
the LAL and LALwrapper libraries be compiled with the -fexception option
was needed and not part of the standard build for these codes. Those
responsible for these codes have been notified of the needed change
for
LAL and LALwrapper when using the new LAM package with the pre 0.0.17
release version of the wrapperAPI.
There were some minor changes to the frameCPP library this week to support
development on the CDS framebuilder. The framebuilder is being updated
to
support multi-frame and multi-second files.
The routine tests were preformed this week to verify performance and
functionality of the baseline LDAS infrastructure. The ILWD socket
tests and the frame to ILWD tests were normal. The database ingestion
tests are showing improved performance on the systems with the new
T3
disk systems.
Hardware Systems (Anderson)
The main LDAS software server at Caltech has been replaced with a new
dual-processor Sun server running a 0.5TB RAID filesystem.
Installation of 7.5TB of disk at LLO is proceeding.
The Sun servers in the LDAS Test system have been upgraded to run mirrored
root filesystems so they will survive single internal disk drive failures.
The first of 7 LDAS disk racks has been successfully powered up via
an integrated rack-mount 220V UPS.
Integration of the dedicated administrative/security/backup server
in each LDAS system is proceeding well.
Data Analysis Activities
Charlton:FCT
* Worked with Linqing on a memory allocation problem - the LAL wrapper
complains that a pointer is being freed twice. We changed some code
around
to track the problem and it seems to be happening inside the FCT engine
itself rather than the wrapper object or LAL FCT interface. We're still
looking into this.
* Fixed some minor warnings and complaints that Jolien and Alan had
about
the LAL FCT test code
General Computing (Wallace)
MIT:
(Keith)
-Upgraded several old machines (2.8) for use as seats
for summer students etc...
-Installed SCSI cards for raid disk array
-Investigated plotter/printer troubles
-Priced new Sun hardware for various projects
-Priced out PC hardware for LDAS installation.
Livingston:
(Shannon & Tom)
-Preparing for the E4 run starting next week.
-Installing SUN equipment for LDAS setup.
-Working a couple of security issues.
-Setup new WEB server hardware and had DNS tables updated.
-Pricing out equipment for various computer/network related
projects.
Hanford:
(Christine)
-All GC Solaris systems have been upgraded to Solaris 8, except fortress
and rainier. Fortress will have to remain at Solaris 7 because
of
drivers for the tape drive, disks, and network interface cards.
Rainier
will be upgraded to Solaris 8 in two weeks.
-The new Sun Forte6 compilers are installed and seem to be working
properly.
CIT:
-Setup laptops and networking for the NSF review.
-Sorted through the old backup tapes so that I could start consolidating
them
to AIT2.
-Currently working on multiple pc/laptop rebuilds.
-Worked with Larry on troubleshooting a network glitch on the 125 subnet.
We
identified the problem (traffic from Luna) but have not yet found the
root
cause.
-Usual round of support stuff.
-Did monthly backups.
(Barbara)
- Installed publications search tool and made a number of other changes
to
the publications web pages and template. The url for the search
tool is
http://admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/pubdcc/pubdefault.htf
and a link is in the
Documents section of the home page.
- Revived and installed the costbook reports. Made several other
changes
to costbook home page and web forms.
- Formatted and installed the GC policy web pages. They are a work
in
progress and still have to be reviewed before becoming official.
- Helped Rita generate a spreadsheet of LSC members.
- Began efforts on LDAS hardware block diagrams.
- I know you are on pins and needles waiting to hear the latest news
about
my problems with the DCC's weekly compact/repair process. It
is not
possible with WebBase to release a database for maintenance in a batch
process. This is distressing news. The options are (1)
keep the batch job
but never cache web database connections thereby slowing web access
or (2)
do the maintenance by hand.
(Sam)
-Worked on a couple of PC hardware problems.
(Larry)
-Worked on the setup/support for the NSF review with Lisa and Liz.
The wireless lan with the DHCP worked well and most of the board members
expressed their thanks for the setup.
-Tracked down a few purchase issues for the LDAS group. Obtained a
few more
quotes and passed a few things over to Bill T. to work on.
-Worked a couple of network issues. Most were simple fixes, the difficult
one to figure out is a problem with luna.
-Interviewed a couple of students to work for the summer. Also, working
in
getting a couple of interviews setup for a PC admin. person.
-Worked/working a number of security related issues.
From: Helena Armandula <ahelena@ligo.caltech.edu>
Silicate Bonding
Had difficulty bonding the 1/2" sapphire substrates to be used for
cryogenic tests by R. DeSalvo.
The bonds showed prominent separation at the edges.
The sapphire substrates are not flat to the 1/10 wave requirement;
they are only flat over 80% of the surface and have rolled edges.
(Verbally, I placed the order for 1/10 wave surface flatness; Crystal
Systems' faxed quote indicated flatness only over 80% of the substrate
surface; I overlooked it.)
I contacted Waveprecision and they will rework the parts for a reasonable
price and delivery time (2 weeks ARO).
Before sending the parts to get reworked, I will be bonding some of
these defective parts at Stanford with Sheila Rowan to see if we get the
same results.
At Stanford I also will be assisting Sheila, by taking the coated LIGO
optic from the chamber after "Q" measurements, and shipping it back to
Caltech.
E2E model
David Tanner reporting
On a visit to Caltech, Malik worked on E2E modeling.
We wrote a code to model a dual recycling interferometer using
the summation technique. The code is urgently needed for the
design studies of the dual recycling 40m by Alan Weinstein.
Advanced LIGO Optical Analysis
Erika D'Ambrosio
I investigated the limit on the reliability of the FFT-code on very
flat beams.
The motivation was a gain performance using "reshaped" mirrors, which
drop down the "thermoelastic noise".
I made several simulations in the last few days changing every time
the spot of
the driving beam and the radius of curvature in order to match the
shape of the
mirrors I was testing for the long arm cavities.
The recycling mirror was chosen also in accordance with the geometry
of the
circulating field following the law of paraxial approximation for the
propagation. I started with ROC=316960m for the feeding beam and spot
size
0.0924836m reducing both step by step. For many times I just had the
program
crashed; sometimes there was an output which consisted in lists of
NaN.
The FFT-code converges for ROC=62300m and spot size 0.0363968m. It
takes a lot
and I had to increase the limit on the number of maximum iterations.
Peter King
40m Lab & LASTI
The vendor has finally agreed to replace the Motorola MV162-P242s for
MV162-PA242s, ie the ones that don't work for ones that do work. For
some
reason I don't understand, the deal the Jay worked out for returning
his
boards didn't carry over to the ones that I ordered.
The phase-correcting Pockels cell has been installed in the laser and
the
optics train into the power amplifier re-aligned. At the moment the
output
power of the laser is 11.5 W with the laser operating at a diode current
of
20 A.
A set of cylindrical lenses to correct for the astigmatism in the 10-W
laser's output has been ordered. I have been chasing up some other
components that Alan asked me to look into.
With Ben, we requested an EPICS EPROM to be sent down by Dave Barker
for a
Motorola IOC in the 40m Lab.
Peter King
LIGO II PSL
Benno and I have agreed to a revised edition of the PSL WBS
Dictionary. The WBS Dictionary basically says that LZH and the University
of Hannover are responsible for everything and that installation is
a joint
task between the LIGO Lab and LZH/University of Hannover. Something
that
was always going to be the case but wasn't explicitly spelt out.
Andreas Weidner, a visitor from Max Planck - Garching, is here
visiting to learn about the CDS design cycle. This is part of the Advanced
LIGO PSL collaboration.
For additional information about this report, contact sanders@ligo.caltech.edu